I enjoy the weight of my KSL, even though it currently tops almost 20KG (with 1300gram tyres on both sides though and including pedals) and perhaps wish to bring it closer to 19KG even.
That's just 500-600 grams apart then, would be probably my GX Casette, Aenomaly Switchgrade, etc.. I might splurge on some E13 cassette and carbon wheelset to get it closer to 19kg.That seems heavy, my S5 is somewhere around 19 without pedals, despite Zebs and heavy wheels/tyres
Interesting commentary on the TQ, that ties with some reviews from middle of last year. That despite being lower powered on paper, the spec 1.1 held its own.
Still love how it rides, my only complaint is the noise.
That's THE question. I have been wondering if I should go for KSL2 from KSL1. I think they will introduce the revision in 2026 since the current package is still a killer.if a new revision is coming soon
That's THE question. I have been wondering if I should go for KSL2 from KSL1. I think they will introduce the revision in 2026 since the current package is still a killer.
Other than a bigger battery I can't see the point in a new KSL. There's no way to fix the lack of seatpost insertion while retaining the design language that makes the bike such a looker.
Yeah, that too./ ride so well
The next one will likely be a completely new design based on whatever the next gen enduro looks like.Other than a bigger battery I can't see the point in a new KSL. There's no way to fix the lack of seatpost insertion while retaining the design language that makes the bike such a looker.
i rather have a motor that is not affected by heatUnfortunately the major drawback of the KSL is its battery, it is pretty low and outdated cells.
There is definitely some improvement/refinement they can do on the battery, motor Idk, to cover more people needs.
Eg: out of park, I have unbearable but small elevation 50-80m but very fast DH 5min tops. So something like 22 laps max which is not very good. On Slash+ I would be right away on 35 runs (I do not include extender, make no sense for comparison).
What conditions cause your motor to over heat? I have never had problem on 30+ degree days climbing up 10-20+ degree inclines for 300m in elevation on loose Rocky fire roads. I am getting over 1000m in elevation in around 2.5 hours without any motor issues.i rather have a motor that is not affected by heat
He is referring to other post related to the slash+ where someone experience it - cannot confirm or deny if it is isolated or not.What conditions cause your motor to over heat? I have never had problem on 30+ degree days climbing up 10-20+ degree inclines for 300m in elevation on loose Rocky fire roads. I am getting over 1000m in elevation in around 2.5 hours without any motor issues.
Has anyone else had issues with their Kenevo SL over heating?He is referring to other post related to the slash+ where someone experience it - cannot confirm or deny if it is isolated or not.
the tq is easily derating*, not the mahle. read properlyHas anyone else had issues with their Kenevo SL over heating?
Es ist die Paradedisziplin klassischer E-MTB-Motoren: Turbo-Modus einlegen und in Rekordtempo auf den Berg schnurren. Inwieweit ein Light-Motor in dieser Disziplin brillieren muss, liegt ganz klar am Einsatzbereich und den Vorstellungen des Fahrers. Im Falle des HPR 50 gehört ein Dauerbetrieb im Vollgas-Modus nicht zum idealen Einsatzbereich. Bei unseren standardisierten Messfahrten an einem steilen Asphaltanstieg über 410 Höhenmeter hatte der kompakte Motor mit deutlichem Derating, also einer Drosselung der Leistung, zu kämpfen. Nach rund 15 Minuten ließ die Leistung spürbar nach. Am Ende des steilen 400-Höhenmeter-Anstieges (12,2 % im Schnitt) zeigte das Display im Fuel EXe nur noch maximal 155 bis 170 Watt an. Zu Beginn waren es 300 Watt. Die Außentemperatur lag zum Zeitpunkt des Tests bei 25 Grad.
Die anderen Antriebe konnten ihre Maximalleistung über die gesamte Distanz weitestgehend konstant halten. Selbst eine etwas gedrosselte Leistung von 240 Watt konnte der HPR 50 nicht über den gesamten Anstieg halten. Den Hauptgrund für das verhältnismäßig frühe Abregeln des TQ sehen wir in der geringen Fläche, die ihm zum Ableiten der Wärme zur Verfügung steht. Das Gehäuse des Motors erreichte an den außenliegenden Flächen eine Temperatur von knapp 70 Grad. Wer eher im mittleren Modus unterwegs ist und die Turbo-Stufe nur kurz zuschaltet, wird von diesem Manko nichts mitbekommen. Ein hohes Fahrergewicht, lange, steile Anstiege und Hitze verschärfen das Problem.
Im High-Modus erreichten wir mit dem HPR 50 rund 1050 Höhenmeter, bis der Antrieb auf den letzten Prozent des Akkus seine Power drosselte. So erkletterten wir nochmal gut 200 Höhenmeter. Die Fahrerdaten dazu: Fahrergewicht 89 Kilo, 150 Watt Tretleistung, Kadenz 80 U/min.
No hablo español.the tq is easily derating*, not the mahle. read properly
*
Light-E-Bike-Motor: TQ HPR 50 im Test
Rekordverdächtig leise, rekordverdächtig geschmeidig. Was der bayerische Light E-Bike Motor TQ HPR 50 kann - und was nicht - klärt unser großer EMTB-Test.www.bike-magazin.de
Why all this hate?Yeah ... shiny bike with very dirty grip, I would never touch them, great anti-theft solution!
Idk they look very dirty like I said, bike definitely deserve something beautiful there too!Why all this hate?
Why all this hate?
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.