Search results

  1. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    I observed the same with my M510 on the E10. I think it’s the sprague bearing (one way clutch) that has some play. Running downhill, the chain slap working against the sprague bearing is causing that rattling noise. I use this simple chain tensioner device, significantly improving the noise level.
  2. thaeber

    shock absorber for E10 ?

    No. It will crush the seatstay bridge against the seattube for shure when fully compressed. Don’t even try it.
  3. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    I run a DPC 245 V1 with M510 at 48V, but I‘m pretty sure this works on every voltage between 36 and 52. There is absolutely no reason to change this compatibility with a new revision. So don’t worry..
  4. thaeber

    New M820 frame from Seraph/TanTan, the E67.

    Is the Bafang battery removable?
  5. thaeber

    New M820 frame from Seraph/TanTan, the E67.

    You bought one? Allready delivered?
  6. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    You’re the buyer? Not the seller? Then it would be nice to write something about Your bike. Thanks mate!
  7. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    Thats some klnd of advertisment of a bike company named „Rockcan“ with no details or link to a website. If You check the website, You find no info at all, looks like under construction. That’s not what I expect from a professional seller here on the forum.
  8. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    @Lehr: Do me a favor and update Your website please before spamming this post with additional pictures mate..
  9. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    No this is documented in the firmware code. No option to be changed in BESST tool. You need a new firmware.
  10. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    Nice! What is the Wh of the 48V battery?
  11. thaeber

    M820 Bafang - LIGHTCARBON LCE930 Frame (lightweight)

    Forget it. Use a starnut 😊
  12. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    I contacted Chili today, she already ordered 40 pcs. of the V3 display at Bafang. Once available, I would offer to collect oders from Europe DIY community and do a combined order if financially attractive.
  13. thaeber

    Dilemma in choosing frame/motor

    Ok got it. I run an E10 frame with M500/510 engine for over 2 years now, overstroked coil shock (170 mm rear travel) and Fox 38 180 mm fork. handling / geo / weight is awesome. I don’t get the hype for even steeper seat angles, there is too much weight on the hands / front end and the toptube is...
  14. thaeber

    Dilemma in choosing frame/motor

    What about a Pole Voima?
  15. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    Easy to calculate, CEF50 vs. E10: - frame is appr. 1,5 kg lighter - battery is only 0,5 kg lighter - engine is 0,6 kg lighter Summing up to weight saving potential of appr. 2.6 kg. If You use a lighter battery (LAnton) You’ll save another 0,7 kg.
  16. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    CEF50 reach is 483, E10 size L reach is 485 - almost same. The difference is the toptube length, 630 vs. 658 for the E10. This is related to the steeper seat angle of the CEF50, so I assume the seated position feels short for You. May be You try to move the saddle backwards as much as possible...
  17. thaeber

    Bafang m510

    No not at all. Same battery consumption as before, and I think I can compare it quite well running my standard evening round.
  18. thaeber

    Bafang m510

    Would You share all the firmware You have, on GitHub for example? Ah now I see - only talking about FC 1.0…
  19. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    All correct- like written above. The effective TT of the CEF50 is 15mm shorter, due to the steeper seat angle. Imagine the seat angle is getting steeper, then the TT is getting shorter without any effect on the reach value..
  20. thaeber

    SZZS specific CEF50-main thread (initial builds and troubleshooting related only)

    The TT of the Crafty is much longer then CEF50, even if the reach value is the same. This is due to the steeper seat angle of the CEF50.
Top