Shinn
Well-known member
Was certainly an interesting comparison. IMO One of their better ones actually, they should have at least matched the suspensions a bit better though.I saw this man. I think it’s pretty legit.
Was certainly an interesting comparison. IMO One of their better ones actually, they should have at least matched the suspensions a bit better though.I saw this man. I think it’s pretty legit.
Levers are the same as the Guide R from what I can tell, the difference is the RE setup is supposed to be optimized for EMTBs. There is only the one adjuster knob for reach, nothing for pad contact at all. Running the stock rotors now, may bleed out the brakes and swap pads to see what kind of difference that makes before throwing money at a new setup - I actually have an older FS bike with Avid Juicy's on it and they have better progression and power IMO but obviously the bike weighs 14lbs less.
They're mud tires - you'd expect that.They seem quite narrow?
I'm not certain but you'll probably find the calipers are the same as you can't really do a lot other than increase the amount of pistons. The difference will be in the lever, where you'll have more adjustment ie, lever throw(handy), bearings instead of bushings(you won't notice) and pad freeplay adjustment(never used it on any of my bikes that have had it).I think I am getting a little confused and maybe its different from country to country. Here in Canada, my wife's 2020 SL came with Code R brakes and it looks like the 2021 SLs are spec'd with the same brakes according to the LBS where we bought it from. According to Specialized, the 2021s will come with Guide RE brakes. Do the RE caliper look the same as the Code R calipers (which are the same calipers that the CODE RSC brakes come with)? I am not sure what OPTIMIZED could mean but the RE brakes cost $20 less than the Guide R brakes. Things that cost less usually mean some compromises were made.
Just a thought but have you looked at the MRP ribbon coil? 51mm offset available and 2110g vs Z1 2500g. I had one of these on my last analog, it was a sweet fork though max travel on 29er ribbon coil is 160mm and couple hundy more than Z1anybody using a fork with 44mm offset ?
thinking of changing to an marzocchi z1 coil.
but unfortunatly it seems that 51mm is not availible.
would be interested in some feedback.
I am, it's great.anybody using a fork with 44mm offset ?
thinking of changing to an marzocchi z1 coil.
but unfortunatly it seems that 51mm is not availible.
would be interested in some feedback.
what differnces did you see in respect to 51mm offset ?I am, it's great.
what model ? and size of bike ? did you feel any differennces which you would rate as differnet to 51mm ?Yup. It’s good
what I have read so far on the marzocchi and the pricepoint makes it very likely that i give that one a try in case i go for coil.Just a thought but have you looked at the MRP ribbon coil? 51mm offset available and 2110g vs Z1 2500g. I had one of these on my last analog, it was a sweet fork though max travel on 29er ribbon coil is 160mm and couple hundy more than Z1
MRP Ribbon Coil 29" (mrpbike.com)
I’m running a Z1 coil at 160mm. Love it so much. So plushanybody using a fork with 44mm offset ?
thinking of changing to an marzocchi z1 coil.
but unfortunatly it seems that 51mm is not availible.
would be interested in some feedback.
how does it feel geomotry wise ? ie as the seat angle flattens how is it doing uphill ?I’m running a Z1 coil at 160mm. Love it so much. So plush
There is just 7mm in it, there is no difference from what I can tell. Perhaps you've got a more sensitive arse than me, but it really shouldn't make a difference. I've got 160mm lyrik ultimate(44mm offset), and I effing love 'em! Bike is SL expert Size Large.what differnces did you see in respect to 51mm offset ?
Hi everyone, hope all are safe and well.
Looking for a bit of advice, I currently have a medium (I am just under 5,9) 2020 Expert Carbon on hold for me while i sort out all the payment paperwork. Would like the Fox 36 and DPX2 though on the 2021 model. The 2020 is just over 1500GBP cheaper than the 2021 model.
So basically my question is, do I stick with the 2020 keeping the carbon wheels, and use the £1500 to upgrade fork and shock in due course.
Or
Spend the extra £1500 now and just get the 2021 model.
Re the other component changes, long term, in an ideal world I would probably look to swap out the cassette with a 1299 at some point and AXS derailleur so not overly concerned about the X01 upgrade on the 2021
Thanks all
Rob
I wouldn't knock the rear shock that comes on the 2020 expert as it's the elite version. Even the stock forks will handle more than most give credit for although I did upgrade mine to 36 performance elites as I was able to get hold of a new set for below £600. You should be able to get the 2020 model for £2000 cheaper than the 2021 model too as I know Infinity Cycles near Durham have a medium in stock for £6400. As has been said previously, if you're looking to change everything, get the Comp Carbon as that another £1k saving over the Expert and even those are great bikes out of the box.Hi everyone, hope all are safe and well.
Looking for a bit of advice, I currently have a medium (I am just under 5,9) 2020 Expert Carbon on hold for me while i sort out all the payment paperwork. Would like the Fox 36 and DPX2 though on the 2021 model. The 2020 is just over 1500GBP cheaper than the 2021 model.
So basically my question is, do I stick with the 2020 keeping the carbon wheels, and use the £1500 to upgrade fork and shock in due course.
Or
Spend the extra £1500 now and just get the 2021 model.
Re the other component changes, long term, in an ideal world I would probably look to swap out the cassette with a 1299 at some point and AXS derailleur so not overly concerned about the X01 upgrade on the 2021
Thanks all
Rob
thx for sharing your experiences.There is just 7mm in it, there is no difference from what I can tell. Perhaps you've got a more sensitive arse than me, but it really shouldn't make a difference. I've got 160mm lyrik ultimate(44mm offset), and I effing love 'em! Bike is SL expert Size Large.
Nice looking rig. I'm looking at forks myself and would like to go up to 160 but do have many ups and downs on my local trailsFox 38 160mm 44 offset.
medium SL
the difference is imperceptible. Going to 160 however is noticeable. - I now have to get out of the saddle for a super steep climb to keep the front down. But it’s only for 1 trail I have that with the 150mm fork the front tire was just floating like a feather and now with 160mm I really have to load balance and put my chin forward of the handlebars. View attachment 50530
Just to put something else into the mix here - UK riders will probably stick a 2.6 tyre up front to cope with the mud and slop we have from September to April. If you keep a 2.4 in the rear you'll probably want to stick to a 150mm fork so climbing ability is not compromised too much.Nice looking rig. I'm looking at forks myself and would like to go up to 160 but do have many ups and downs on my local trails
That's the theory for running narrow tyres on 4x4s and I used to think the same for mtbs, but when you look at the spacing of the tread blocks of a 2.4 vs 2.6 you'll see why it's the opposite for many of the popular tyres used during UK winters (e.g. Magic Mary). The 2.6 will clear the mud far more effectively than the 2.4. If I was just riding X-C I'd consider a narrow tyre but for me, the ride through the mud is to get to the technical decents and I find the 2.6 MM wins hands down.If anyones going up in tyre size for mud then Good luck, you want to go down size so the tyre cuts in, you don't want the tyre floating and squirming on the surface.
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.