Levo SL Gen 1 Official Levo SL Thread
- Thread starter Rob Rides EMTB
- Start date
-
- Tags
- levo sl
- Thread starter
- #1,472
Yeah, they should really add the cable to it. I had no idea it wasn't included.
Killswitch73
Well-known member
I got mine discounted as a package when I got mine .. all in 12% off including Extender and the cable .
Killswitch73
Well-known member
Not got the shock yet but I was told by shop this would need doing in workshop .. ??
So did you turn the top eyelet adjustment side so it would fit the frame ? Or did you just turn the bottom eyelet to fit the flip chip ? Ordering the shock from j-tech they do it if you mention the bike is a stumpjumper,Levo ,SL 2020 fitment .
I think the reason is there are two versions - 160mm for Levo SL and 220mm for Creo SL. I’m running my Levo with the 220mm cable
Killswitch73
Well-known member
That’s the wrong cable . 160 is the correct one .I think the reason is there are two versions - 160mm for Levo SL and 220mm for Creo SL. I’m running my Levo with the 220mm cable
- Thread starter
- #1,477
Then maybe a nice gesture would be a cable priced at £10 ?I think the reason is there are two versions - 160mm for Levo SL and 220mm for Creo SL. I’m running my Levo with the 220mm cable
- Thread starter
- #1,478
I’ve found the SL is so quick on flatter / undulating terrain. Quite a bit faster than full fat bikes. Once full fat hit 15mph then they rarely go faster.
SL keeps on going, easily to 20+mph (tyre dependant). I had to wait a few times today for my full fat friends to catch up.
SL keeps on going, easily to 20+mph (tyre dependant). I had to wait a few times today for my full fat friends to catch up.
MrBrownstone
Well-known member
Yeah 5’6 = small frame. IMO.
The honest answer is that I don't remember, as this was a while ago now. I definitely remember that I was able to fiddle with the angle that the lever and adjustment screws were at. Am going to look back through some photos and see if I can jog my memory...Not got the shock yet but I was told by shop this would need doing in workshop .. ??
So did you turn the top eyelet adjustment side so it would fit the frame ? Or did you just turn the bottom eyelet to fit the flip chip ? Ordering the shock from j-tech they do it if you mention the bike is a stumpjumper,Levo ,SL 2020 fitment .
Any issues with pedal/crank strikes? Are you running the chip in high or low? What rear wheel/tyre combo are you running?
My Mudhugger FR install on the rear. By mounting to the chain stays, the guard moves relative to the pivot point and isn't lifted relative to the stays. When mounted to the seat stays, the lower portion of the guard lifts, relative to the chain stays, which can leave mud gathering above the pivots on the rubber guard. Mounted this way, the rubber guard almost becomes redundant, but the addition of the extender (seen at the top of the mudguard) means the linkages remain fully protected, even at full compression of the rear triangle. I run the same setup on my Kenevo, have done for around 8 months now, and it does an amazing job of keeping the linkages, shock, and motor housing really clean (compared to the rest of the bike). Plenty enough clearance for a 2.5" Aggressor.
- Thread starter
- #1,484
Wahoo Element BOLT now has Levo integration.
@Rob Hancill - is that an alloy handlebar?
With a carbon bar you wouldn’t have to work out with the heavy dumbbells shown in the pic ?
With a carbon bar you wouldn’t have to work out with the heavy dumbbells shown in the pic ?
- Thread starter
- #1,486
I actually strap those to the frame to get the full fat weight simulation
MrBrownstone
Well-known member
LOVE that frame color.?
jcmonty
Well-known member
Initial thoughts on mullet on my XL (typing with thumbs , sorry for stream of consciousness typing )
the good :
geo changes are great! Does not feel too slack, feels just right for what I ride generally. Bike seems more neutral and ready to attack. This feels more to do with the geo changes than wheel size.
lower bottom bracket height felt great in the turns. No pedal strikes on fairly chunky terrain
corners like a smaller bike but feels more stable than stock. Pretty cool actually
uphill switchbacks were easier. Climbing overall felt great
rear wheel felt more supple in some situations and less so in others. I think due to my lighter setup with this carbon wheel and lack of an insert helped here due to less unsrung mass.
neutral:
traction felt a bit less in some situations. Could be due to the tire / wheel combo more than the 29 vs 650b
bad
Felt like more rolling resistance on the road ride to the trails. This more feel than actual stats (same power output and speed according to garmin on this segment). Again this could be due to tire setup.
...
going to keep this setup for a while. It’s definitely fun! For longer xc or backcountry rides, 29er will probably be my preference still . Have another ride at a pedaly spot with lots of berm/jump/flow trails as well as some tech, but less steep than today’s. Will be a good comparison
the good :
geo changes are great! Does not feel too slack, feels just right for what I ride generally. Bike seems more neutral and ready to attack. This feels more to do with the geo changes than wheel size.
lower bottom bracket height felt great in the turns. No pedal strikes on fairly chunky terrain
corners like a smaller bike but feels more stable than stock. Pretty cool actually
uphill switchbacks were easier. Climbing overall felt great
rear wheel felt more supple in some situations and less so in others. I think due to my lighter setup with this carbon wheel and lack of an insert helped here due to less unsrung mass.
neutral:
traction felt a bit less in some situations. Could be due to the tire / wheel combo more than the 29 vs 650b
bad
Felt like more rolling resistance on the road ride to the trails. This more feel than actual stats (same power output and speed according to garmin on this segment). Again this could be due to tire setup.
...
going to keep this setup for a while. It’s definitely fun! For longer xc or backcountry rides, 29er will probably be my preference still . Have another ride at a pedaly spot with lots of berm/jump/flow trails as well as some tech, but less steep than today’s. Will be a good comparison
Yep, they'll work with what you want. Doesn't mention internal rim width, though you'll want around 30mm.
That's great, thanks for the detail ?
Rich the gasman
E*POWAH Master
Any chance when your not super busy multi bike testing you could do an updated review of your SL mate. We need more videos of bikes
- Thread starter
- #1,493
Yeah I will!Any chance when your not super busy multi bike testing you could do an updated review of your SL mate. We need more videos of bikes
Right now, out of 8 ebikes (including some crazy top end stuff) the SL is the one always I pick to ride.
I'm loving my SL so much already, that I'm considering ditching my Kenevo..!
MrBrownstone
Well-known member
???
Depends on how much use my Kenevo gets in the next couple of months. Time will tell, but there's only been one feature, on one trail, that I've ridden on my SL where I'd have preferred the Kenevo.
I’d keep them both!
No point keeping both if only one is getting ridden though.
Fair enough, I could never get rid of my big girl.
Similar threads
EMTB Forums
Latest articles
-
Introducing the Forestal e-Cygnus - a downcountry and XC emtb
The new Forestal e-Cygnus is a slightly unusual emtb. It comes in two... -
2025 M1 Sporttechnik EN 8.0 review
The M1 EN is one of four M1 models built on the same frame. Well, it’s...