TCFlowClyde
Active member
If the new CEF50 build comes in at 42/43 lbs ready wet-weight with the integrated, bigger 720 Wh battery, it's definitely worth it to me and my riding style/needs. And is discussion worthy as a M820 thread.Isn’t this discussion of wanting a big battery sort of defeating the whole reason for a lightweight lower powered bike ? Batteries are heavy, more so than any other part of the bike and to fit a larger battery you will need larger down tubes and larger components, meaning more weight.
Far better to aim for about a 450Wh 2P battery which should fulfil most people’s 2 -3 hours of riding and add a water bottle type add on for those wanting longer rides. My EZesty FAZUA seems to suit this quite nicely and I simply carry a spare battery on any longer rides. My only grumble is that I never use fully both batteries and if I could fit 1/2 a battery as a water bottle, then that’s the next level up of convenience.
![Flexed biceps :muscle: 💪](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f4aa.png)
I also contend the 21700 cells, on this particular downntube configuration save a little more weight than would the traditional 18650 cells, all in order to shed even more off overall frame weight. How much, I don't know. Hoping that I can get to 42/43 lbs with pedals, heavier tires (sealant and foam inserts incl.)
![Crossed fingers :fingers_crossed: 🤞](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f91e.png)
The bigger battery may also address the unique needs of 820s higher torque at 75Nm in general.
Just say'n, discussion note worthy in this case.
![Clinking beer mugs :beers: 🍻](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f37b.png)
Last edited: