carlbiker
🛡️🚵🛡️
- Thread starter
- #31
The head angles on all those bikes are within a gnats chuff of each other. It's hard to look at geo tables and work out how a bike is going to ride, but that cube has smaller wheels so logic says it might feel more agile than the wild. But there's more to bikes than geo tables and spec lists, go ride some and decide what you prefer.
Yes, it sounds sketchy and sounds like it requires a good amount of skill to ride. It also sounds the sort of thing I'd prefer to be on my normal bike for given the choice of that or my ebike,but then on the way back up I'd rather be on the ebike! I hate pedalling up more than I hate a bit less agility on the way down.
I think you're coming round to the realisation that all bikes are a compromise somewhere.
Right, hence why I want to try a lighter bike and get best of both worlds ?, what if this bike is good enough to not need your normal bike all of a sudden? On a normal bike I’d tackle these type of sections but quite often I see ebikers avoiding them altogether for obvious reasons.....it’s much more difficult because of being encumbered. Now you would get down it (and I’d love to be watching) but you’ve migrated up through multiple bikes to get to a point you can compensate where I would struggle, yet if I’m on the analogues I can do it almost likes it’s going in slow motion. Theres no short cuts as Gary will take delight in me saying, but I think id learn more on an analogue bike than a 25kg ebike atm.....but like you say losing on the uphill is a mare and actually will cost me learning time