I'm very tempted, kind of waiting for Spesh to release their next SL, I would expect the spec on the Trek for the price point will be better than the usual Spesh garbage?
Blue 9.8 XT set to arrive in November. Gonna sell the XT drivetrain. I’ve got a X01 AXS shifter/derailleur going on with XX1 Eagle cassette and chain. I’ve ordered I9 hydras to replace the stock hubs and gonna lace the stock wheels with DT Swiss Competition spokes. This set up should be less, or very similar costs to the 9.8 GXS build with better components. I’d like to keep the bike at 40 lbs or less ready to ride. I think the components going on should make up for the weight of the pedals and keep the weight where I want it.
I thought I read on the Emtb Facebook page another guy was going to do the same thing but was not sure if it would work as the XT one has a different front cog
Rode the AXS a few days last week. Great bike. Pedals well even when off. Did some really technical descents and high speed ones over rocky terrain. At times I forgot I wasn't on my Slash. But I wouldn't change my Rail 9.8 for it, as I realised I prefer a full emtb. The Exe would have to be an additional bike, and I can't justify that (at least yet )
That wait for the V2 with those specs will be around September 2025. There will be a lot more 60nm SL bikes from other brands out by then.I'll wait for the V2 to arrive with V1 bugs sorted and hopefully 400Wh battery and >60 Nm motor but <20kg.
You should have a look at the new Pivot Shuttle SL before deciding on either of your choices, the Pivot has a stronger and better motor with a better battery than the Trek.I'm very tempted, kind of waiting for Spesh to release their next SL, I would expect the spec on the Trek for the price point will be better than the usual Spesh garbage?
I rode both a recent trip to Santa Cruz California, I've ordered the Pivot Pro XO1 from Saddleback, just preferred the build quality, silent motor and range.Stronger and better………
have you ridden both ?
Wouldn’t 10 more NM= more torque and stronger?Stronger and better………
have you ridden both ?
The rear end travel feels similar to my regular Yeti SB130, the bike in general felt like the Pivot Switchblade, albeit with less suspension, that I have recently sold.What was the pivot like with the lower travel rear end?
Do you have stats on the range and elevation achievable on both bikes ?
Having ridden both motor systems (TQ HPR 50 and Fazua Ride 60) its difficult to call one better than the other. The TQ has more finesse, design seems better integrated (the display in my opinion is much better than the Fazua plastic thing with lights), the TQ remote is superier (Fazua seems weaker and way more flimsy).I rode both a recent trip to Santa Cruz California, I've ordered the Pivot Pro XO1 from Saddleback, just preferred the build quality, silent motor and range.
How many miles was this 1500 meter ride?The rear end travel feels similar to my regular Yeti SB130, the bike in general felt like the Pivot Switchblade, albeit with less suspension, that I have recently sold.
A 3.5 hour ride with 1500 metres of elevation and 20% battery remaining was enough for my needs, the real plus was the lack of any drag from the motor when not in use, rear brake rotor needs to be bigger and a carbon wheelset would make what is already a true superlight even lighter.
I agree with your summation to a point but it comes down to personal choice and integration of a system into the chosen bike brand and model, for me, riding.both back to back over 4 convinced me to put my money where my mouth is and buy the Pivot, happy trails.Having ridden both motor systems (TQ HPR 50 and Fazua Ride 60) its difficult to call one better than the other. The TQ has more finesse, design seems better integrated (the display in my opinion is much better than the Fazua plastic thing with lights), the TQ remote is superier (Fazua seems weaker and way more flimsy).
The Fazua still has about 24 ratchet points in the motor (i didnt actually count but it ratchets around the internal gearing) which is much slower to engage when you start pedaling, and is noisy when freewheeling. There is also a high pitch motor wine at higher cadences. The TQ is fluid, silent and instantly engages.
Overall, the TQ build quality seems superior to me..
But, the Fazua is definitely more powerful, the battery bigger too.
Better? diffucult to call, I would be hard pressed to choose one over the other if I had a single choice to go in a bike...
I am definitely going to do a head to head video on these 2 systems, I have both bikes in person now,
@Rob Rides EMTB nice contribution. Cheers.
I wonder how many classifications of eBikes we will end up with?
Having ridden both motor systems (TQ HPR 50 and Fazua Ride 60) its difficult to call one better than the other. The TQ has more finesse, design seems better integrated (the display in my opinion is much better than the Fazua plastic thing with lights), the TQ remote is superier (Fazua seems weaker and way more flimsy).
The Fazua still has about 24 ratchet points in the motor (i didnt actually count but it ratchets around the internal gearing) which is much slower to engage when you start pedaling, and is noisy when freewheeling. There is also a high pitch motor wine at higher cadences. The TQ is fluid, silent and instantly engages.
Overall, the TQ build quality seems superior to me..
But, the Fazua is definitely more powerful, the battery bigger too.
Better? diffucult to call, I would be hard pressed to choose one over the other if I had a single choice to go in a bike...
I am definitely going to do a head to head video on these 2 systems, I have both bikes in person now,
It's a trail called The Three Musketeers, 39 kilometres with an elevation of 1485mtrs.How many miles was this 1500 meter ride?
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.