TBF a nice big pair of incontenence pants would just add to your protection
Hmm ..... just like dual airbags really!
TBF a nice big pair of incontenence pants would just add to your protection
Cheers I never got any options, only to add CE1 D30 chest to the front but it’s not looking like I can keep the foam and D30 in there.....did you find this top sweaty? It doesn’t breathI just selected the Demon SAS-tec option & I already had a back plate.
SAS-TEC Back Protector - RevZilla
Cutting edge SAS-TEC material is intelligent armor constructed from visco elastic soft foam smart molecules. It has earned the highest CE rating avai…www.revzilla.com
I’d just bought a bell super 3r this morning, £95 as new comes with the added bonus of cherry parts are actually more like pink! But after reading ’crumple zones’ I was like....oh, CRUMPLE ZONES then the first hit on google was this thread Product Review - [Warning: blood e.t.c.] Considering a Bell Super 3R... think again now I’m like I need the super DH or something else ?Keep in mind with helmets that the testing for compliance is purely about reducing skull fractures - which is great ..
BUT ! Most head injuries are concussion related - take Ben's experience for instance. MIPS helps towards this as some energy can be angularly deflected. After my head bashing last year with a normal polystyrene based helmet I had really bad concussion - 4 weeks. Without the helmet I would probably have fractured my skull. Wouldn't have been the first time, but it's something you want to avoid as it can come with many complications or one final huge simplification.....
Hopefully more manufacturers will start prioritising this, but unless the compliance regulations change, there's not much reason for them to spend more on development if they don't need to.
I now only ride with helmets with some form of crumple zone with the hope of reducing concussion. Yes, the helmet maybe scrap afterwards - but if that's the case - it probably saved your life or certainly some of your intelligence. For my full face, the Smiths Mainline. Personally, having tried a few different ones, I also think it's the nicest made helmet and the most comfortable. A lot will depend on the shape of your head with different brands/helmets. On the bright side, there are a lot of fairly well made and well thought out helmets out there.
Oh fab I’ll dig into this, might get some ordered!!I've never seen these guys before :
Quite impressive ! 7mm thick for CE2. VERY breathable and flexible.
EDIT : looks like the A-XOC armour is actually manufactured by SAS-TEC, hence the similar specifications - though different design.
Gotta be honest. I'm struggling to see how your @Gary protection attaches to your mangina.SAS-TEC also make a fantastic Cock n Balls protector for @Gary
Is that the base "air" CE1 , rather than the Pro - CE2 ? and you're upgrading the Shoulders/elbows to CE2 ?@Zimmerframe I would say heres the winner, I'll upload the vids shortly
I updated my summary list on the front page to compare the other costs of upgrading all the tops too for good measure, I clearly have so many better things to be doing atm!
Thats my new order to try the Large out, I tested the medium already
Is that the base "air" CE1 , rather than the Pro - CE2 ? and you're upgrading the Shoulders/elbows to CE2 ?
I think I sized in as a Medium ... but didnt' try it ....
Shame they don't do a chest ... It's a bit mad buying a £250 state of the art Scott top - to then bin the back protector and put in a £75 one from a-xoc. Does look better though - much cooler ..ordered, some velcro is needed with this stuff though as its super flexible by looks
Sizing guide here <b>Size Guide</b>
They will actually send you the stuff for free and you pay on invoice......Interestingly they have a back that fits the Scott by looks
@Zimmerframe noticed these guys are selling the Scott, if you subscribe you might even get 10% off also... Scott Softcon Air Pro S21, protector jacket level-1/2 - motoin.de
It’s up so go watch, I ended up doing two vids.....you wouldn’t replace the back of the Scott it’s actually very good, just shorter and ofc it’s CE2 already in the pro version (when you buy the right one!)Shame they don't do a chest ... It's a bit mad buying a £250 state of the art Scott top - to then bin the back protector and put in a £75 one from a-xoc. Does look better though - much cooler ..
Thanks for that - signed up. Glad a few more places are stocking the Scott. The 10% is off RRP - and it's already about 10% off. Still cheaper than anywhere else though.
It feels like Leatt must be releasing a new range soon .. Their stuff is good, but not amazing. Fit and design is nice, but the armour is basically just memory foam so it's heavy and hot. Troy lee fee like they should be releasing a 7955 or something .. but are they ?
The latest SAS-TEC, D3O Ghost and A-XOC isn't in anything you can buy which is usable.
I'm tempted by the Scott, but having tried so many that are lacking I'm at the point of giving up and just blending what I have.
Still looking forward to your softcon air review though !
Yes I have the Type 2 SAS-tec tripleflex plates and being so breathable and reportedly even more protective makes it my preference over d3o. I think d3o elbows, gloves, knees etc work really well where ventilation isn't an issue.Juts doing a quick look around at the SAS-TEC "Tripleflex" armour.
There seem to be two types .. They're both very flexible, but one is made of a mesh and is therefore considerably more breathable ! It's the twin of the A-XOC version which uses a mini tube pattern instead.
If both perform as proposed, they make most of the existing armour obsolete. It's light, flexible, very protective and has excellent breathability.
Type 1 - the solid one .. no good for MTB really, it will still get hot and sticky.
View attachment 41992
Type 2 : NICE !
View attachment 41993
If it works ..
They seem to make it in yellow too if that matter to you ... So far I've only found this pattern referred to as "TripleFlex 40"
View attachment 41994
Haven't really found much with the A-XOC in. They make a vest but the back protector is not full width. They also do "underpants" which consist of hip and knee protection. No idea what that would be like on an MTB though...
Yes not sure why but you can buy the SAS-tec tripleflex plates to replace d3o.The latest SAS-TEC, D3O Ghost and A-XOC isn't in anything you can buy which is usable.
Excellent !! Good to see the director showing her face too .It’s up so go watch, I ended up doing two vids.....you wouldn’t replace the back of the Scott it’s actually very good, just shorter and ofc it’s CE2 already in the pro version (when you buy the right one!)
Excellent !! Good to see the director showing her face too .
Welcome to the painful world of "what's the best armour" ..
1st problem - everything is a compromise - more armour, less flexibility, more heat, less comfort.
2nd problem - "WHY DID THEY DO THAT" .. yes, it seems the same with every single piece .. the Scott for instance .. I almost clicked buy from your link last night and then waited for the review. Two things. The CE2 back in the pictures looks lots wider than the CE1 back in the pictures - but looks the same length. In reality, the CE2 back doesn't look that wide compared to the pictures and it's WAYYYYY too short .. MERD !
Weirdly, in their CDI'd bit of video at 26,49,53 seconds:
It shows the back coming all the way down over the top of the ass !
View attachment 42076
View attachment 42077
View attachment 42078
Chest looks nice .. can you take some pictures of the inside of the chest and back armour so we can see how much venting there really is ?
It might be the back would be fine on me with the medium, so maybe the Large will be ok for you. You found the Forcefield back in "small" to be too short, the same one on me covers the back nicely.
Love this picture .. looks like a twilight zone or black mirror ...... "The man trapped in a body protector......"my fingers pointing through the back.....
Love this picture .. looks like a twilight zone or black mirror ...... "The man trapped in a body protector......"
View attachment 42092
So on the Scott .. the holes going THROUGH the actual armour sections look quite large ? Good air flow !
Be interesting to know what they weigh - but then the backs smaller than the Racer, so a pointless comparison.
Is that a Kidney belt you velcro up before you zip the suit up ? Tricky, will potentially hold things in place better and get rid of that paunch but will make it hotter as the stomach will then be three layers thick. Two of them potentially none breathable sweaty velcro panels.
I'm on the fence with ordering.
I still like the 7855 best for coverage and it weighs nothing and give pretty good protection. The Leatts fit nicely, but I just find too hot compared to other things for what they give (all three of them). The Forcefield I have to say I fall more out of love with each day and it's probably never going to be worn again. I was going to cut it up and Merge it with the 7855, but the other armour options seem better and certainly far better vented - it's important to remember, it's not just about protection, it's about feeling as close as possible to being unarmoured ! It's destined to be a cat bed at this rate.
The 5955 doubled with the 7855 and Racer is great - but the back feels too bulky really when doubled up especially on the Racer - though it actually sits better on the Racer than the 7855.
The racer still feels the most like a second skin ... the back and shoulder protection are excellent. When I ride it in, I feel the most liberated. I just accept that the elbows and rest of the body are not that well protected and enjoy it.
For me, at the moment, it's feeling like I'm mainly riding in the Racer - for comfort and freedom. and maybe the 7855 for .... uhmmm .. I don't know .. I just like what it gives .. but worry about the back ..
After all the others I hate wearing the hard armours now really - though the 5955 is the most neutral feeling.
Either way .. the Racer, even if I wear it less in the winter, will be staying close to hand for summer riding.
So maybe I try a Scott .. or maybe wait .. It's nice (if the back is long enough for me), but if anyone pulls their fingers out of their bottoms , it could be obsolete already.
I've not returned anything I've tried out as it's been sweaty and disgusting ! One aim was to make sure it was usable in 32-36c heat. Several things were returned without even being tried on as they were just not even remotely upto the task !I think there's little danger in Scott being made redundant as it ticks every box which is the only top to do so, the others wont wake up, just the way things are...
I wish me and you could sit in a room with a technician to draft some plans up and get it produced as it would be better than whats out there, even without all the scientific research, basic crap like larger pads and adjustable straps is just a no brainer right? Thats ventilated yet has a good check and back, oh and lets add some elements for the rib section too and maybe a little foam here and there too....Racers elbow pads are smaller than the others btw, although its stretchy so you could upgrade them. Its the chest Im just sure its needed, that 5855 is some serious kit, I too had the idea if an additional chest but cmon, its like £400+ of gear to compensate a silly shortfall.....
Buy it/Try it/Return it/Keep it.....nothing to lose by testing it, given your other 14 tops already
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.