Neeko DeVinchi
E*POWAH Elite World Champion
Well, it somewhat coincides with my working theory that the end user/consumer does have some control to either determine or influence the net price of the product in question.I don't work in the bike industry so I don't have the price breakdown. But even if I did it would not help the argument. The fact that a bike maker just assembles items bought off the shelf does not mean that there is no design and development cost embedded in the price. If the design was older than the write off period of the initial design and development cost then the item may be sold cheaper without affecting the profit. If we were still buying rusting steel framed bikes with rod brakes then they would be really cheap if there was a market for them!. Once the products have been made whether they are components or complete bikes, if they don't sell fast enough, every maker and/or retailer discounts them. They do this because they lose less money that way. All companies do it except those that deliberately restrict the amount they make, or trash any they can't sell as a matter of policy.
@Gary is right, if people object to paying the price in sufficient numbers, the stocks of unsold bikes will rise and prices will fall. The answer is in our hands.
I've read other threads previously which you have kindly left your in depth comments on which are pretty much consistent with what you've highlighted now so I'll keep an open mind.
Accessibility and availability remains my working theory but I'll be sure to swing you an early draft of my article once I've finally got testimonials from in side sources.
Respect Steve ??