Other 2023 Levo SL - Full 29er?

Feb 21, 2022
79
23
Los Angeles
So I got home and took the entire drivetrain off the bike and started the setup from scratch and realized that specialized ships the bike with too short of a chain according to SRAMs own calculator. No matter what I do I can not get the knurled plate lines aligned. I also realized one reason why the bike has been shifting terribly from day one is one of the chainlinks is very stiff.
 
Feb 21, 2022
79
23
Los Angeles
Yes it had 116 just as recommended in the short chainstay position. It recommends 118 for the long chainstay, but when I switched to long I didn't add 2 links and it works just fine.
Interesting, I also had 116 and it started shifting poorly and only got worse in long chainstay mode. Are your two lines aligned on the RD and plate?
 

ah1

Member
Jul 11, 2020
102
40
Santa Cruz CA
So I got home and took the entire drivetrain off the bike and started the setup from scratch and realized that specialized ships the bike with too short of a chain according to SRAMs own calculator. No matter what I do I can not get the knurled plate lines aligned. I also realized one reason why the bike has been shifting terribly from day one is one of the chainlinks is very stiff.
I would suggest - get the proper chain length, and try the setup in B. If it doesn't work well, do what I did and switch to A (keep the 21T setup cog) and see if that works. You won't be ruining anything - you can always go back - and it's a 10 minute trial and error. If A works for you, just ride that and ignore what SRAM says and be happy about it :).
ALSO if you're only missing two links on your recommended chain size, I'd do this experiment even w/o replacing a chain. Yes, 2 links do affect shifting but not enough for you not to notice the improvement. Then if you see the bike shifts well enough in A you can decide if you want a new chain or not (mine is XX costs an arm and a leg so I won't replace it unless I feel the gears misbehaving)
 
Feb 21, 2022
79
23
Los Angeles
I would suggest - get the proper chain length, and try the setup in B. If it doesn't work well, do what I did and switch to A (keep the 21T setup cog) and see if that works. You won't be ruining anything - you can always go back - and it's a 10 minute trial and error. If A works for you, just ride that and ignore what SRAM says and be happy about it :).
ALSO if you're only missing two links on your recommended chain size, I'd do this experiment even w/o replacing a chain. Yes, 2 links do affect shifting but not enough for you not to notice the improvement. Then if you see the bike shifts well enough in A you can decide if you want a new chain or not (mine is XX costs an arm and a leg so I won't replace it unless I feel the gears misbehaving)
Right - I am going to see if I can get shifting better in A even with the defective chain, I'll still try to warranty the chain either way. When I get a new chain I will run it 118 and see if I can get it feeling good in B or A. I wonder why I can't get it perfectly aligned if I have the same set up as you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ah1

Vin829

Member
Feb 18, 2020
107
42
California, USA
I’m getting ready to put my S3 as a full 29er. I’m going to set the horse link in the 29ers position. But what should I do with the flip clip? Should it be in the high or low position? Currently it’s in the high with a 27.5 setup
 

ah1

Member
Jul 11, 2020
102
40
Santa Cruz CA
I’m getting ready to put my S3 as a full 29er. I’m going to set the horse link in the 29ers position. But what should I do with the flip clip? Should it be in the high or low position? Currently it’s in the high with a 27.5 setup
You don't need to do anything special with it - if you change the horse link and put a 29er, the flip chip will reflect the "true" geo of the bike. So you can have it on high or low, depending on your preference. If you want to keep your current setup, keep it in high.
The previous discussion was aimed at riders that change the horse link to 29er BUT keep a 27.5 wheel - because the wheel is smaller than intended, that drops the BB substantially, more than desired. That's why it's recommended for that scenario to always use the "high BB" setting. In your case it doesn't apply.
BTW as a favor to us other owners, maybe post here in a few weeks how you're feeling the diff on that bike between a mullet and a full 29er? Thanks!
 

Vin829

Member
Feb 18, 2020
107
42
California, USA
You don't need to do anything special with it - if you change the horse link and put a 29er, the flip chip will reflect the "true" geo of the bike. So you can have it on high or low, depending on your preference. If you want to keep your current setup, keep it in high.
The previous discussion was aimed at riders that change the horse link to 29er BUT keep a 27.5 wheel - because the wheel is smaller than intended, that drops the BB substantially, more than desired. That's why it's recommended for that scenario to always use the "high BB" setting. In your case it doesn't apply.
BTW as a favor to us other owners, maybe post here in a few weeks how you're feeling the diff on that bike between a mullet and a full 29er? Thanks!
Will do
 
  • Like
Reactions: ah1
Feb 21, 2022
79
23
Los Angeles
By the way I ride the Levo SL in low and 29er (long) in the back while mulleted and run 160mm cranks. The thing absolutely rails, I’m leaning the bike with the saddle clearing the inside leg completely. I can turn my hips and practically lay my outside knee on the top tube. No pedal strikes and we have extremely rocky terrain in Simi Valley. I’m running the suspension pretty firm and fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ah1

ah1

Member
Jul 11, 2020
102
40
Santa Cruz CA
By the way I ride the Levo SL in low and 29er (long) in the back while mulleted and run 160mm cranks. The thing absolutely rails, I’m leaning the bike with the saddle clearing the inside leg completely. I can turn my hips and practically lay my outside knee on the top tube. No pedal strikes and we have extremely rocky terrain in Simi Valley. I’m running the suspension pretty firm and fast.
oh man I need to visit Simi Valley, been there a few years ago and it was a blast!
 
Feb 21, 2022
79
23
Los Angeles
Forgot to mention, I was reflecting on all the bikes I’ve enjoyed over the decades of riding, and they all have one thing in common: a more even front center ratio. I threw this into excel. you can see the “good ones” in green below.
1722209867792.jpeg
 

tk1971

New Member
Jul 28, 2024
5
4
SG, CA USA
I ride my SL2 as a full 29er with the flip chip in 29 setting, rear shock flip chip in high and the +1 headset cup. I also have 155mm cranks from the kids Levo SL hardtail.

I’m short and ride a S2. I ride lots of XC trails with long steep climbs, the occasional jump, lots of drops (2ft and under) and rock gardens. I found that in stock form, I get a lot of pedal strikes and struggle on really sharp/techical/exposed switchbacks, hence the changes above.

BTW, I took my bike to an authorized LBS to change the rear wheel setting on the TCU. Apparently it’s not possible on the Gen2 Turbo SL. I txted Specialized directly and this is what they said: “Hey, thank you so much for reaching out. I'm sorry, but they cannot make this change it comes that way. The mileage will be off. but technically, it should make the bike run a bit faster. “.

I then asked if previous gens and other models (Kenevo, Turbo Levo) can be configured for a rear 29 and I got this: “If the bike is the latest generation of the specific model, it cannot. but previous generations could.”
 
Last edited:

guglez

Member
Oct 15, 2023
24
2
Germany
I took my bike to an authorized LBS to change the rear wheel setting on the TCU. Apparently it’s not possible on the Gen2 Turbo S
Did you just say that the software of the motor do not support 29" wheels and they always think that it's a 27.5" and there is nothing you could do about that :eek:?:eek::eek:
 

tk1971

New Member
Jul 28, 2024
5
4
SG, CA USA
Did you just say that the software of the motor do not support 29" wheels and they always think that it's a 27.5" and there is nothing you could do about that :eek:?:eek::eek:
Yes, that is exactly what I am saying.

The bike shop told me the only thing I can do is to contact Specialized and let them know how disappointed I am to not have this option, so that they can possibly put it in their next software update.
 

ah1

Member
Jul 11, 2020
102
40
Santa Cruz CA
@guglez I take it you haven't acquainted yourself with the Specialized software yet... Not saying other vendors are better (they're not) but Specialized is notorious for missing key functionality and sometimes going backwards on software. Just google the many "satisfaction" threads on the sh*tty new app they rolled, which is buggy and missing functionality...
That being said, they still make the best ebike packages IMO that's why I and probably some other folks here put up with their nonsense. But yes what @tk1971 is saying doesn't surprise me one bit.
 

rushy46

New Member
Jun 2, 2024
3
10
Austria
I did some reasonable back to back testing between the stock mullet and full 29er setup this weekend.
My background - 185 cm/ 79 kg on a Levo Sl size S4. My normal bikes have been full 29er since 2015 so I am maybe a bit biased. I used the same tires (Eliminators) on both setups - but different hubs and cassettes, but that should not play a major role.
Climbing was easier on the full 29er. Especially on steep climbs I didn‘t have to move my weight actively forward for better traction, the longer (but not long) chainstays definetely helped there.
On mixed terrain with many ups and downs I preferred the mullet - it accelerates faster after braking, so no surprise here either.
The downhills were a tricky one - the mullet setup is unbelievable nimble and playful, not only for an E-bike but for any bike. So I was curious how the 29er would perform and was pleasantly surprised. As a full 29er it is still a playful bike - S4 for my height may play a role here. The biggest difference is the braking traction which is much better with the 29er rear wheel. Build berms were lots of fun with both setups but on real steep and technical terrain I had more confidence in the 29er rear wheel.
In my opinion taller riders should definetely try the Levo Sl as full 29er. You don‘t lose much in playfulness but gain more traction and outright speed. For smaller riders and sizes I think the mullet is the way to go. But at the end of the day it is like always very much a question of your personal preference. :)
 

ah1

Member
Jul 11, 2020
102
40
Santa Cruz CA
I did some reasonable back to back testing between the stock mullet and full 29er setup this weekend.
Thanks for the extensive feedback! That's to be expected. I am a taller rider (188cm, 80kg) and my other bikes are full 29ers but I thought I'd give this mullet thing a try and as you mentioned I too was pleasantly surprised. Setting the bike in the 29er position (despite the mullet rear) takes care of the climbing issues - it climbs as good as same one 29er imo. On the steeps and tech I agree 29er wheel might work a bit better, but the mullet also does fine (mullet does have a bit of bonus of not hitting my butt when it's really steep, but I'd still prefer the rollover of a 29er).
BTW this being my first mullet I did notice the disadvantage of two different wheel sizes when I got a nice spare tire with my bike that would be great on the rear, but alas the spare is 29er size...
 

EMTB Forums

Since 2018

The World's largest electric mountain bike community.

552K
Messages
27,891
Members
Join Our Community

Latest articles


Top