i don't use go app, only BESST tool. Yes it's seem thermal regulation and it's the bafang explanation. BUT, motor is cold at hand contact and consumption is very low and why one day lot off variation and other no on the same track ?
i have 32T front and 11/52 rear. I don't take care of max speed (25 km/h is enough for me), i will appreciate if i could mount 28 front but impossible with original star in 104BCD
No. mine is in 48V. happy to read that other people have problems of power variations. I was wondering if I wasn't the problem. everybody have asked to linda ? if several request, may be it will be more easy to have support from bafang.
Those said, i need to say that in my last exit i had...
Mine done power variations since the begenning at upper level (speed/speed+) and cut at boost. I can't know if it's normal (too hot, bafang answer) or not ? i suspect not because i consume +- 50% less than M510 and it's seems similar of those i had on M510 previousley, (solved by torque sensor...
Hi. does somebody use this frame in "mulet" 27.5 rear and 29 front ? does they have compensate the geometry with longer rear shock ? with what ? wich BB height result ? thanks for your help
48V batteries are provided by the frame builders. For those i have: dengfu, SZZS and generic (for the lightcarbon) they have only + and - for charging, may be bafang battery (43V) use 3 contacts ?
HI. Me no. It's the reason why i ask if somebody have tested. I'm still interrogate if my motor functioning correctly. Less powerful than M510 is normal, but as it consume nothing, i'm not sure that it provide all it can.
About varnish, i think that lightcarbon (alike the other manufacturer) have not performed it because you have not request (some customers don't want to add few grams). For those tested (lightcarbon, dengfu, SZZS) glossy varnish has really great quality and provide efficient protection
Which soft rev do you use ? for those have tried the 2 available (CRX30PC4809E102007 3_eMTB_230721 and CRX30PC4812E102006.3_eRoad_230721) which differncy do you feel ? on which kind of use ?
63.2° with 2.8 rear, imagine if you use 2.4 or 2.5. On the CEF50 with 150 front travel, 210x51 rear shock and 2 x 2.9 (2.4), i mesure 63.5° and 1.3 M of wheelbase on my XL. i would prefer 27.5 rear (more light and strong), but i want not less than 63.5 and more than 1.3M. That means 29 rear...
For that i have understand following KaroKönig sharing, bosch cranks will be increase Q factor of 12mm on the M820.
https://www.emtbforums.com/threads/bafang-m820.29230/page-10