Search results

There is a new batch already? Any info on differences? Hardware / Controller/ Firmware?

Great! The matching color of the frame and the ZEB is awesome! What’s the color code please?

I wish I would…😂

No not at all - I detected the cable break by bending the cable forth and back. It was always between the frame exit and the display port.

I never jused the harness for brake or shift sensors. I don’t need that, so I have no experience. I run a single canbus cable from motor to the display, and that causes enough trouble for me. Many connectors- many problems, unfortunately. Good luck with troubleshooting!

Check the suspension charts of the E10. Axle path / chain growth. Of course there is chain backslash. It’s optimized to balace the different effects like anti rise / anti squat, but it’s there. Not saying this decoupled chainwheel is noticeable, just theory. Looking at the price of this system...

If You are standing on Your pedals, running downhill in rocky terrain, Your rear suspension is causing backslash with every compression. Your chain is pulling the chainwheel backwards. The chainwheel is decoupled from the motor axle using rubber decoupling elements. They are eating up the impact...

Hmmm.. if You ask for the spider, I‘m not sure. There are many reviews telling it‘s great, specially descending in roughest terrain. Smoothen Your ride and make it way more silent. I would line to try, but it’s expensive unfortunately..

The cranks look awesome, but no big weight saving at 495g. The spider is not just a spider, there are some rubber decoupling elements to soften the effects of the rear suspension in regards of pedal backlash.

Could someone take the original cranks coming with M820, put them on a desk, and measure the 22,2 / 25,2 dimension? If the Q8 is available and fits, use the 22,2 crank for smaller Q-factor. I assume the Q8 FB means Fat Bike which requires wider crank to clear chainstays. Just thinking…

That’s weird. But all the shox are speced 22mm mounting width, and that’s standard eyelet mounting hardware. Not trunnion.

The Q factor is the distance between the right and left crankarm at the bore for the pedal axle at the inner faces of the cranks.. Only problem could be, that the „lower Q“ crank hits the chainstay on left or right side. The chainline of both cranks is the same, the chainring spider is mouted to...

Are You sure? Trunnion mount needs ball bearings in the swingarm. Standard mount works without, the bushing is press fit into the shock eyelet allowing the shock to turn around the trough axle. 2 different system, not compatible imho.

Trunnion shock will not fit. The specs clearly says You need 190x51 standard mount. The mounting for trunnion requires 2 bearings in the swingarm. The swingarm of this frame is designed for standard eyelet shocks. No chance. Send it back.

Thanks mate. Never did that with a shock (no reason, more travel is always better 😂). Just did this on forks, and here its the other way round. Fork will not fully extend, with effect on installed length….

If this is the problem, just treat the carbon like You would do with aluminum. Take a file an rework the area. I doubt it will weaken the part seriously. There is no force or sideload to be considered in this area imho.

The CEF50 frame does not have a crossbar like pictured, correct?

Those travel reducers, they limit the stroke by not allowing the damper to fully compress? Means, at end of reduced stroke the damper will hit a shim or spacer?

Check the Canbus cable / connector motor to the display. Those cables are not very reliable, my E10 has about 4.500 km now, and I‘m on the 3rd cable. If the cable is defect due to internal cable break or not fully inserted / leading to a loose contact at the display cable port, exactly this happens.

Nobody can take this decision for You. The advantages are not huge, but they are noticeable. If You buy a set, the DPC 245 display and new tiny controll unit are really nice. And You have a spare engine, just in case. This spare engine could be upgraded later, or sold.