addthebadd
New Member
It still has an old school gearbox do I doubt it will get close on noise.
Got my new one earlier in the week. 9.8. This is an excellent bike - and no motor issues.Cancelled my order! Motor issues have me a bit worried. Will stick with my levo for winter see how things are looking next year.
That head to head comparison would be much appreciated.Having ridden both motor systems (TQ HPR 50 and Fazua Ride 60) its difficult to call one better than the other. The TQ has more finesse, design seems better integrated (the display in my opinion is much better than the Fazua plastic thing with lights), the TQ remote is superier (Fazua seems weaker and way more flimsy).
The Fazua still has about 48 ratchet points in the motor (i didnt actually count but it ratchets around the internal gearing) which is much slower to engage when you start pedaling, and is noisy when freewheeling. There is also a (slight, but noticeable) high pitch motor wine at higher cadences. The TQ is fluid, silent and instantly engages.
Overall, the TQ build quality seems superior to me..
But, the Fazua is definitely more powerful, the battery bigger too.
Better? diffucult to call, I would be hard pressed to choose one over the other if I had a single choice to go in a bike...
I am definitely going to do a head to head video on these 2 systems, I have both bikes in person now,
Rob, Would you not include the Orbea Rise in the Low Weights/Super Light category? I'm excited about the 3 bikes you mentioned and am seriously considering the Fuel EXE as my next ride but it seems like Orbea is oftentimes overlooked. I've thoroughly enjoyed mine and feel like it still competes well with the 3 you mentioned.i see it as this:
Low Weights (Super Light): 16-19KG mid power (Fazua / TQ / Next Spesh) 50-65nm 300-450 watts
Full Fat: 22-26kg Full Power (Brose / Bosch etc) 85-95Nm 500-800 watts
I think the low powers (35nm ish) will pretty much disappear within 12 months
I think the difference is that the ones he's mentioned use motors which are specifically developed as "lightweight" - lower power motors.Rob, Would you not include the Orbea Rise in the Low Weights/Super Light category? I'm excited about the 3 bikes you mentioned and am seriously considering the Fuel EXE as my next ride but it seems like Orbea is oftentimes overlooked. I've thoroughly enjoyed mine and feel like it still competes well with the 3 you mentioned.
Great point! I should have paid more attention that he is really talking about the motors and not the specific lighter weight bikes.I think the difference is that the ones he's mentioned use motors which are specifically developed as "lightweight" - lower power motors.
Where as the Rise, uses a de-tuned EP8 motor to enable the use of a smaller battery to create a lighter bike with a good performance envelope - more a Semi Skimmed than a Full Fat (if using English/European Milk types as a convention) a bit like Focus did with the Original Jam2's (even with the option of a "TEC pack"/range extender) - but before "lightweight" / SL - was something we considered a "type" until the Levo SL came along with the Mahle (which was rumoured to have been originally developed for Orbea - no idea if that is true or not) .
Like your frame protectors!My 9.7 has just arrived at my LBS here in the UK. )
My 9.5 Fuel EXe will be at my LBS on 8/29. They are going to fully custom build the bike, so it is getting stripped to the frame before I take a ride. I should have it sometime in early September, done and ready to hit the trail.
Build specs:
Fuel EXe 9.5 in Matte Dnister Black
- X01 AXS derailleur and shifter
- XX1 Eagle cassette
- XX1 Eagle Chain
- I9 Hydra Hubs
- Nox Farlow; 27.5 rear wheel / 29 front wheel (gonna run it mullet)
- DT Swiss Competition Spokes
- Deity Bladerunner pedals
- Deity Apex 35 stem
- Deity Skywire 35 mm handlebars
- E13 E-spec carbon 160 mm cranks
- Shimano XT 8120 brakes
- Bike Yoke Revive dropper post, 160 mm
- Fox Float X2 shock
- Fox 36 Grip 2 Performance Elite 160 mm fork
- Specialized Power Arc Pro seat
- SRAM HS2 disc brake rotors - 200 mm
- Bridgestone Kryptotal RE 27.5 (rear tire); Kryptotal FR 29 (front tire)
- Lizard Skin Peatty lock-on grips
- Jagwire braided cables
- Trek Range Extender
Can‘t wait to take this bike for a spin.
@Swingset - yes, many Utah trails are rough with lots of rocky ledges, step-ups, step-downs, etc. However, these tend to be harder on the rider than on modern high-end mtbs. (Pedals can suffer abuse if your BB is too low or you’re not careful.)@levity and better half Levity. Utah is tough on mechanical things. Any issues with the pair of EXe's?
Not getting many straight answers as to when my ordered 9.7 is going to be available (two separate dealers said they would have one in 454 days). Local shop has a 9.8 in stock. Looks like the highlights are carbon wheels, cranks, and stem/bar and the suspension change to RS from Fox. May just have to choke down that extra 1k and get this over with
what size are you looking for?
I do not know how it affected the geometry. I never rode it with 29” rear wheel. This bike is much longer and slacker than anything else I’ve ever ridden. I really don’t have much to compare it to for you. I will say that it took me a few rides to get comfortable descending, but after 4 rides, it is really coming alive for me. I do think I like the mullet setup, but need more time on it.Hi, I am particularly interested in this bike but wanted a more enduro geometry/suspension lightweight ebike. I was wondering if you ended up using the 27.5" wheel in the back, and if you did do you know how it affected the geometry, would the head tube angle be closer to 64 in this case, how does it affect pedal strikes?
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.