jmulvaney
Member
When I ride my SL with wife and kids on their acoustics, I leave the engine turned off. Green and Blue runs. Amazing how well the bike rides as an acoustic also.
YupWhen I ride my SL with wife and kids on their acoustics, I leave the engine turned off. Green and Blue runs. Amazing how well the bike rides as an acoustic also.
Waiting for an SL motor? What happened?Now i'm waiting for a new motor....
I'm hoping to throw a leg over one this week, and this is exactly what I need to read: the SL (if I buy it) will be a slightly early 60th birthday present to myself, and if it takes me back to when I was 50, I'm in - the Carbon Comp, I reckon.This felt like I was riding my regular bike and I was 30 years old, instead of 61.
Four days.. View attachment 34789
I m thinking I’m going to put a 2.6 on the frontOn the SL I can't get past the skinny 2.3 tires. Out here in Arizona where we have lots of rocks, big tires, run tubeless with low air pressure are the way to go. 27.5x2.8 have fallen out of favor and 29x2.6 are the closest newer eMTBs come, so that is as far as I can compromise. It seems like 160mm/150mm is too much suspension for an eMTB more targeted at XC-like trail rides, those are enduro numbers. For dropping down some rocky chute I am back to the grip of big tires. If you can afford both, then the SL would be perfect for its intended use but not my choice to all mountain rides. I would rather have the suspension and traction when I need it and suffer with the weight and power when I don't.
I m thinking I’m going to put a 2.6 on the front
Do you think a 2.6 would fit on the rear too? If the fork/frame will accept the larger tires...well...that's a different story...
Still has the 34 fork though.....
Do you think a 2.6 would fit on the rear too? If the fork/frame will accept the larger tires...well...that's a different story...
Still has the 34 fork though.....
Waiting for an SL motor? What happened?
Do you think a 2.6 would fit on the rear too? If the fork/frame will accept the larger tires...well...that's a different story...
Still has the 34 fork though.....
You can still have all the suspension ..On the SL I can't get past the skinny 2.3 tires. Out here in Arizona where we have lots of rocks, big tires, run tubeless with low air pressure are the way to go. 27.5x2.8 have fallen out of favor and 29x2.6 are the closest newer eMTBs come, so that is as far as I can compromise. It seems like 160mm/150mm is too much suspension for an eMTB more targeted at XC-like trail rides, those are enduro numbers. For dropping down some rocky chute I am back to the grip of big tires. If you can afford both, then the SL would be perfect for its intended use but not my choice to all mountain rides. I would rather have the suspension and traction when I need it and suffer with the weight and power when I don't.
If you ride slowly or are very light or don't ride on steep/rocky terrain then yes it's fine but for mountain bike riding on an ebike they are flimsy.Nothing wrong with the Fox 34...
I'm far from slow, far from very light, I blast hard rides, and the 34s are absolutely solid.If you ride slowly or are very light or don't ride on steep/rocky terrain then yes it's fine but for mountain bike riding on an ebike they are flimsy.
Given the cheap components it seems like buying a lower spec SL and upgrading is the best route. The brakes and fork are a joke. Even the s works has a flimsy 34 and underwhelming shock.
Hi Simmo,As for the brakes guide r 4 pot on my carbon comp when i first got the bike i was very underwhelmed by them very vague feeling and no bite at all! was going to swap them out but had a set of 203mm ice tec rotors front and rear so installed them, purchased a set of copper free pads from disco brakes (their top pads) and could not be happier with them now, had guide re on my 2018 levo carbon comp and they were good, and now the guide r are as good if not better! solid feel on the lever and nice bite point good modulation and can lock up at will. found the sram pads to be crap so try this first before swapping out might save some time and money.
Yep, sounds right.Also have found the fox 34s fine for the riding I'm doing and at 230lb I'm no lightweight.
Hi Simmo,
thanks for the tip. What do you think is making the biggest difference - the bigger rotors, or the pads?
Yep, sounds right.
Nobody would dispute that 36 or 38 forks are going to be stiffer than 34s - that's just physics - but calling the 34s "flimsy", even on an ebike, is a bit of a stretch...
Brilliant - thanks, Simmo.pads without a doubt obviously the rear going to 203mm helps but as soon as i swapped out the pads the lever feel went from pulling nearly to the bar to the bite point half way and firm feeling can lock both wheels at will (i got disco brakes copper free their top pads very happy with them also have sintered both i can recommend).
Hmmmm - those tan sidewalls look really good with that frame colour - and it's the colour/model SL that I'm waiting for delivery of...
I don't know what other forks you have tried but maybe they are the best forks you have ridden?I'm far from slow, far from very light, I blast hard rides, and the 34s are absolutely solid.
Maybe mine are set up better.
We have words ? if you disagree , you can engage in a discussion. At the end of it, you and/or whomever you disagree with might agree instead !And what happened to the disagree reaction emoji? Have we all become too precious for someone to have a different opinion
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.