Is the e13 crank issue now fixed?

Singletrackmind

Active member
Sep 17, 2020
468
424
San Diego, CA
Received the crank arms today what tool is used to tighten up the preload caps is it a shimano special tool View attachment 85071
Based on input from a similar thread, purchased this aluminum end cap that is much more robust then cheap plastic type material that came stock on my YT Decoy. Also purchased tool to remove stock end cap and it cane off very easy. Could have used something from toolbox without dropping any cash for tool since I was replacing cap anyway. Have a tool I will never use again! New aluminum end cap uses standard allenwrench.
 

Singletrackmind

Active member
Sep 17, 2020
468
424
San Diego, CA
  1. Ask Shimano?! Most stuff has been out of stock for months, not just the crank arms. Also since Orbea is using Shimano cranks for their recall that's going to suck up some of the supply.
  2. Seem to be standard.
Pretty sure they are ebike specific meant for the EP8 or E8000 motor. If thread is too long, will bottom out against spindle arm and not seat up against crank, thus not securing crank to motor spindle.
 

ped

Member
Aug 7, 2018
13
14
germany
After more than 7000km on my orbea rise M20 i had no issues concerning cranks and spindle.
But following this discusssion i decided to install some Shimano FC-EM600's at my own expense.
It is worth 40€ to feel safe. I am not really interested in waiting for the e*thirteens to fail.
For the weight watchers: FC-EM600 = 550g, e-thirteen = 497g

FC-EM600.jpg


e-thirteen.jpg
 

ped

Member
Aug 7, 2018
13
14
germany
I wondered if he meant the carbon ones. Seems pretty shitty that Orbea are using cranks that the motor manufacturer themselves have said are incompatible with the spindle. Seems the em600 cranks are compatible and SUPER cheap compared to the em900/XT ones, but I don't know if they weigh a bomb and I can't find weight specs anywhere on those.
EM600 = 550g. I just mounted a pair. see my recent post.
 

Longfellow78

Active member
Jan 4, 2022
284
116
Hampshire
After more than 7000km on my orbea rise M20 i had no issues concerning cranks and spindle.
But following this discusssion i decided to install some Shimano FC-EM600's at my own expense.
It is worth 40€ to feel safe. I am not really interested in waiting for the e*thirteens to fail.
For the weight watchers: FC-EM600 = 550g, e-thirteen = 497g

View attachment 85207

View attachment 85208
Excellent first hand data. These are almost the exact weights I posted from manufacturer data: EM600, EM900, M8150 crank weights confirmed - EMTB Forums

Funny that parts manufacturers can accurately measure their parts to a few grams of accuracy, but bike manufacturers are hundreds of
grams wrong!
 

neilo

Member
Jan 25, 2022
50
21
Australia
For those that have switched to the EM600 cranks from eThirteen, what happens with the external "seal" (cover?) on the drive side of the eThirteen (the one that covers the chainring lock ring), it looks like the Shimano cranks don't have one? Does it matter?
 

pragrick

Member
Oct 14, 2020
51
15
Prague
I have the carbon cranks

Sadly the only shimano cranks I can find in stock are The lowest budget FC EM600 these aren’t the hollow tech ones

I know they will fit just not sure about losing my high end cranks for the budget Shimano ones

anyone got any opinions on these arms as in the Em600 ones ???
they have them here, just bought a set only have 165mm 100euro
 

Singletrackmind

Active member
Sep 17, 2020
468
424
San Diego, CA
If price isn't a consideration-
 

DanMcDan

Active member
Mar 18, 2021
159
111
Torquay
If price isn't a consideration-

Approved by shimano though…,,,
 

Singletrackmind

Active member
Sep 17, 2020
468
424
San Diego, CA
Approved by shimano though…,,,
Honestly don't think Shimano will approve anything other than their own products. Check out 5 Dev's website, they are top notch and manufacturer complex aerospace parts with tight tolerances. Have spoke to their R&D guys, lots of time and effort went into designing their EP8 compatible crank arm. My Yeti came stocked with 160mm Shimano cranks. Shimano doesn't have an OEM 160mm for the E8000 motor and before I understood EP8 cranks are compatible on E8000 motors if you use a 5mm spacer, went with the ethirteen's and really like them. No issues, come with crank boots and look cool too!
 

RickBullotta

E*POWAH Elite World Champion
Jun 5, 2019
1,847
1,579
USA
If price isn't a consideration-

Same weight as FC-EM900 and 2X the price, plus not guaranteed by Shimano to be compatible - what's the benefit besides a blingy look?
 

redrhino

Member
Mar 24, 2020
45
23
california
Haven't had issues with two different rises, mine and a friend that we ride hard on. Honestly this feels like something shimano is responsible for. Very thin wall with a hole drilled in it... are you kidding me. That area the cranks are attached to should be double the thickness.
 

Singletrackmind

Active member
Sep 17, 2020
468
424
San Diego, CA
Same weight as FC-EM900 and 2X the price, plus not guaranteed by Shimano to be compatible - what's the benefit besides a blingy look?
Never underestimate the importance of bling factor😜. They are made of aerospace grade aluminum and CNC machined from a single billet. Not cheap cast crap aluminum. As mentioned, if $ is not an issue and you like having something unique, go for it. Personally I have never had an issue with Shimano cranks (other than not being able to find them for sale) or E13 cranks for that matter.
 

Murphius

Active member
Jun 19, 2020
104
108
Washington
Oh Damn. Were they set up to the "new" recommendations, i.e. with loctite, 14nm, and with the hole the opposite side to the pinch bolts?

I didn't even ride my bike with the e13s, pair of XTs went straight on before I started.
Yes, followed the new guidelines. Pretty disappointing.
 

Bike&Beer

Member
Jan 2, 2021
22
17
Surrey
One of mine came off yesterday too 😭 (slow speed uphill thankfully)

I’ve got the M20 with alloy cranks and to be fair I haven’t had any issues over the last 18 months. I did the threadlocker etc but hadn’t checked torque for the last few rides, so keep an eye on it if you’re sticking with e13 (I’ve ordered shimano xt cranks)
 

Bigtuna00

Active member
Nov 27, 2019
556
337
CA
Shit. First instance I have seen of this since the new guidelines. Maybe your bike shop didn't follow them?

Have you spoken to them about it?
The "guidelines" include checking for hairline cracks in the axle. I suspect that's what happened here.
 

DubSea

New Member
May 6, 2022
18
7
California
Haven't had issues with two different rises, mine and a friend that we ride hard on. Honestly this feels like something shimano is responsible for. Very thin wall with a hole drilled in it... are you kidding me. That area the cranks are attached to should be double the thickness.



Shimano does not exactly have an outstanding track record for standing up and taking responsibility for product issues. It's borderline shocking that a recall has not been done for the road cranks.
 

Longfellow78

Active member
Jan 4, 2022
284
116
Hampshire


Shimano does not exactly have an outstanding track record for standing up and taking responsibility for product issues. It's borderline shocking that a recall has not been done for the road cranks.
In this case its 100% orbeas and e13's fault. There have been no instances I have seen of this happening with Shimano cranks, and shimano only certifies its own cranks as compatible (or I believe one's with an identical design around the axle end).

Admittedly the hole in the axle is totally retarded and seems to just be there for that gimmicky bit of plastic to tell you when the crank is on the axle far enough.

But the e13 cranks do not have a tight enough tolerance in the crank/axle interface and they walk off the axle over time from the microscopic wobble (so I've read). This, combined with the hole as a weak point is what causes the breaking. There needs to be a recall and replacement with Shimano cranks, but it is orbea to blame, their choice to spec garbage cranks and commencal have done a recall.
 

cookie70

Active member
Mar 23, 2022
204
152
Central Coast, Australia
Add mine to the list of bikes with non-driveside arm falling off M10.

I even contacted orbea when I got the bike who stated that mine should be in the batch that have had the appropriate changes made to it! Not happy, luckily neither I or the bike (as far as I can tell) sustained damage.

Why doesnt the tech update say to reapply fresh loctite to the preload cap if it already had been applied? seems strange
1659310727602.png
 
Last edited:

ebsocalmtb

Active member
Sep 29, 2021
232
244
Southern-Cal
Add mine to the list of bikes with non-driveside arm falling off M10.

I even contacted orbea when I got the bike who stated that mine should be in the batch that have had the appropriate changes made to it! Not happy, luckily neither I or the bike (as far as I can tell) sustained damage.

Why doesnt the tech update say to reapply fresh loctite to the preload cap if it already had been applied? seems strange
View attachment 93675

My take, (not a mechanical engineer... so take it with a few grains of salt), is that aluminum is potentially the wrong material for that cap. It seems that shimano may be onto something with a plastic cap that deforms if/when the axle bends and/or expands with heat. It's been said elsewhere in this thread... but I'm a very seasoned bike mechanic and while I don't make my living doing it, I easily could. I checked my e13 cranks on both my and my wife's m20 rise's religiously, as much as every ride. I had them installed properly, read all of the documentation and updates on the correct install methods (from both orbea and e13) and that didn't stop the crank arms from falling off.

Since putting shimano XT cranks on my bike, and shimano deore (really, non series) cranks on my wife's bike... I've not had a single issue with this. In fact, I realized the other day that I had ridden my rise for about 4 months without checking the cranks on my personal m20. Checked them the other day, and they were still just as tight as the day I put them on, and the spindle shows no cracks, thread issues and the end caps were still as tight as they needed to be.
 

Bigtuna00

Active member
Nov 27, 2019
556
337
CA
The caps are not for retention. The caps are for preload ("pre" as in "before tightening"). If you crank falls off, it's not because of the cap. It's because the crank bolts were loose. The caps don't have enough torque or material to keep your cranks on under any non-trivial load.

The plastic design of the Shimano caps is to prevent you for over-tightening the preload, not to retain the crank at different temperatures.
 

ebsocalmtb

Active member
Sep 29, 2021
232
244
Southern-Cal
The caps are not for retention. The caps are for preload ("pre" as in "before tightening"). If you crank falls off, it's not because of the cap. It's because the crank bolts were loose. The caps don't have enough torque or material to keep your cranks on under any non-trivial load.

The plastic design of the Shimano caps is to prevent you for over-tightening the preload, not to retain the crank at different temperatures.

I agree that the caps are not for retention generally, but they clearly play a part. From my pov/experience... it seems that there is some amount of deformation of the aluminum ep8 spindle occurring. Whether that's from the installation of the pinch bolts on the cranks, or if it's from heat cycles of the spindle or if it's from the interface (splined along with threaded pre-load end cap along with taper/friction from the portion of the crank that pinches on the non-splined part of the spindle...) I do not know. What seems clear to me... is that there are a few things at play causing this, and it's not as simple as pull a rubber spindle spacer and use loctite.

It seems that either the plastic pre-load end cap threads are deforming, or the whole pre-load end cap is deforming and that is stopping the pre-load cap from working it's way out. Which is a contributing factor to the fact that the shimano cranks, do not come loose. The truth is, the e13 cranks are not falling off with the aluminum pre-load end cap still attached to the spindle. Which points to the fact that the first domino, is the pre-load end cap coming off. Then the splined interface and pinch bolts, seem to fail at their respective tasks, which causes the crank arm to walk off.

I believe, if it were as simple as, "the end cap does nothing more then stop you from over-tightening the pre-load", then the e13 aluminum end cap would stay in place. Instead, there is something going on with the metallurgy and resulting design of shimano's system, that makes that more reliable. I can only assume, that the pre-load end cap is deforming in concert with the end of the spindle, which allows the crank tightening bolts to hold torque better, and to not work slop into the splined interface to the spindle. I do on the face of it, think that their purpose is that simple, but it seems that there is some deeper engineering going on.

After all, shimano is really a metallurgy and forging company at its' core, that makes bike and fishing products. If they had the opportunity to leverage their in house forging or machining, they are going to. The whole situation from top to bottom, has me looking at their hollowtech II interface, thinking that there is just more going on then what you see at surface value... especially since they were confident enough to use a hollow spindle on the ep8 when it was tested with their own cranks.
 
Last edited:

cookie70

Active member
Mar 23, 2022
204
152
Central Coast, Australia
Since putting shimano XT cranks on my bike, and shimano deore (really, non series) cranks on my wife's bike... I've not had a single issue with this.

Great to hear. My local dealer is looking after it. I have asked them to secure some 8150 cranks in 165mm regardless of what the orbea warranty outcome is.
 

EMTB Forums

Since 2018

The World's largest electric mountain bike community.

554K
Messages
28,018
Members
Join Our Community

Latest articles


Top