I do this too. But it does Not report the second Plus battery or current wattage consumption, or allow you to set ride levels. If you borrow a Levo for a few hours you will see what should be there. It’s no more effort for them to do this right, since the App is heavily promoted along with the bike. Having all wrong values for things is no doubt someone in mgmt saying to just ship it and be done with it. Oh well.I never even open the app now, no need for it, I got a Garmim Edge 130 plus, the cheapest one with ANT+ and it shows all I need with instant startup. I recommend this to everyone.
You can show more or less fields.
Garmin records your ride FAR better in every detail too. I used to feel a bit annoyed about my bike before this, but now never even think about the app. It's replaced as far as I'm concerned.
App field is Ebike Field
View attachment 79857
Post from the app to Strava and it might show true values. Mine doesThe distance traveled reported by the app is not reasonable. My app says the bike has gone 97 miles, but I haven't been able to ride it enough to get that kind of mileage. I'd guess I have less than half the reported mileage. Any ideas how to fix this?
Someone previously suggested posting comments to the Appstore, app-support@giant…. so they could respond directly. I did this but, no response so far.
I agree totally, what I struggle to understand is how Giant, clearly a passionate cycling company, could allow such a SNAFU to happpen. My best guess, certian to be 100% wrong, is that there is some serious anti-ebike bias in the higher altitude offices of Giant's corporate complex, and they simply can't see what's possible. Somebody is missing an entire paradigm shift because of bias.Software developed in Taiwan explains it. No doubt Taiwan is the place to go to have quality frames made but you’d be hard pressed to find Outback mountain bike riders who would have the intuition necessary to design this user part of the software. Sticking a spec in front of some office dweller developers gets you this. They would not know that showing like 50 watts human effort is all wrong. I’ve been down this road in project management.
Giant in common with other major bike brands have as their core business ( and therefore experience and competence) the design and manufacture of bike frames..........yes frames not complete bikes even given that all other components to make up a complete bike are 3rd party. Those 3rd party suppliers require fairly minimal integration with the business of bike design so that partnership works.I agree totally, what I struggle to understand is how Giant, clearly a passionate cycling company, could allow such a SNAFU to happpen. My best guess, certian to be 100% wrong, is that there is some serious anti-ebike bias in the higher altitude offices of Giant's corporate complex, and they simply can't see what's possible. Somebody is missing an entire paradigm shift because of bias.
Partially agree. Specialized has this software done to a very high standard. They get it. This video shows a very distinct deign team.Giant in common with other major bike brands have as their core business ( and therefore experience and competence) the design and manufacture of bike frames..........yes frames not complete bikes even given that all other components to make up a complete bike are 3rd party. Those 3rd party suppliers require fairly minimal integration with the business of bike design so that partnership works.
Now we come to E bikes and major bike brands have taken a couple of different approaches to integrating 3rd party components such as motor, batteries , controllers and sensors. The most reliably strategy likely the one that requires only the minimum of integration whilst leaving the entire design of those elements where the expertise lies.....Bosch, Brose, Shimano.
So then we come to software. There are 2 elements here. There is a minimum requirement for software to control the electrical components and that is invariably an integral part of the 3rd party supplied equiment. Then there is software that additional to that basic requirement, and that involves external communications whether that is blutooth, GPS, Wifi, 2g/3g/4g, Android, IOS, Windows. Now we enter a field of expertise that neither the Bike brands or the electrical component suppliers have!! Indeed neither are even likely to be able to have any meaningful discussions with organisations or individuals who do have that expertise.
In short, where the Bike Brands have moved from well established electronic control systems ( torque sensors, speed sensors, electricaql control units, basic information displays) to the field of IT, they are working well beyond the realms of competence of their own organisations and that of their suppliers. Until and unless a brand lists an IT organisation of repute responsible for its IT implementation I would avoid it!!
yes Specialized did a decent job and a couple of years a go as well. It may be that they had no choice since they opted to take a motor from Brose and design their own control software. Things are ( were?) different for Bosch equipped bikes with Bosch being a closed and complete system. Not sure where Shimano or Yamaha equipped bikes stand in that respect. You can understand the motor brands wanting to protect the reputation of their product which could be damaged by poor software implementation. On the other hand we now have Orbea with a specific version of the EP8 and Giant with a specific version or development of the Yamaha motor.Partially agree. Specialized has this software done to a very high standard. They get it. This video shows a very distinct deign team.
Yes Spec started with just a Brose motor, that lasted 100 miles before it blew its cookies. Hoping my 21 has this sorted out. Seems like they’ve worked hard at improving it. My problem is figuring which bike I ride and which ones my adult kids ride.yes Specialized did a decent job and a couple of years a go as well. It may be that they had no choice since they opted to take a motor from Brose and design their own control software. Things are ( were?) different for Bosch equipped bikes with Bosch being a closed and complete system. Not sure where Shimano or Yamaha equipped bikes stand in that respect. You can understand the motor brands wanting to protect the reputation of their product which could be damaged by poor software implementation. On the other hand we now have Orbea with a specific version of the EP8 and Giant with a specific version or development of the Yamaha motor.
A partnership with Garmin, as Giant has with Yamaha, would seem a nice start towards getting the discussions going. I deal with an IT department almost daily, and I'm not sure the answer lies with this bunchGiant in common with other major bike brands have as their core business ( and therefore experience and competence) the design and manufacture of bike frames..........yes frames not complete bikes even given that all other components to make up a complete bike are 3rd party. Those 3rd party suppliers require fairly minimal integration with the business of bike design so that partnership works.
Now we come to E bikes and major bike brands have taken a couple of different approaches to integrating 3rd party components such as motor, batteries , controllers and sensors. The most reliably strategy likely the one that requires only the minimum of integration whilst leaving the entire design of those elements where the expertise lies.....Bosch, Brose, Shimano.
So then we come to software. There are 2 elements here. There is a minimum requirement for software to control the electrical components and that is invariably an integral part of the 3rd party supplied equiment. Then there is software that additional to that basic requirement, and that involves external communications whether that is blutooth, GPS, Wifi, 2g/3g/4g, Android, IOS, Windows. Now we enter a field of expertise that neither the Bike brands or the electrical component suppliers have!! Indeed neither are even likely to be able to have any meaningful discussions with organisations or individuals who do have that expertise.
In short, where the Bike Brands have moved from well established electronic control systems ( torque sensors, speed sensors, electricaql control units, basic information displays) to the field of IT, they are working well beyond the realms of competence of their own organisations and that of their suppliers. Until and unless a brand lists an IT organisation of repute responsible for its IT implementation I would avoid it!!
Had also "troubles" with the 1.8.x version!
I've sent all my notes to our local Giant Team in Austria ([email protected])
They asked me to put the things also in the app-store.
There - Nothing happened.
I don't use the app for recording my tours - for such things I use Garmin 830 instead.
Will check the new version soon.
I also do not understand, that the app needs an internet connection fot changing the assistence level.
The WATTS values are very low too.
I'm quiet fit and 80% of my usage I ride with eco mode - 75
10% with BASIC 125
10% with ACTIVE 200 - very hard conditions
I assume you are referring to a department in a company responsible for keeping your PCs running.............and yes they call themselves an IT Department!!A partnership with Garmin, as Giant has with Yamaha, would seem a nice start towards getting the discussions going. I deal with an IT department almost daily, and I'm not sure the answer lies with this bunch
A reality check :-( I borrowed a Garmin 530 to get a further read on the numbers being put out by my RideControl/Strava (which seem to match but in reality no surprises considering that the RideControl is the source). Giant App / Strava as attached shows speed 16.4 and 51Ks max (v unlikely), Garmin 530 shows 15.7 and 32.9 max. This is clearly correct so I take back my previous comment that the Giant App data seems more accurate!!To be fair, my impression is the app has been performing better lately, data reported seems more accurate and matches that shown by Strava. I am not sure what has changed as to my knowledge there have been no updates but whatever it is, I'll take it
you do realize your elevation stats as measured using GPS will be greater if you are tall and on a larger sized bikeIs the app improving? Now when I have my new bike I would like to update it (Maybe fixes my ANT+ lag issue) but I'm afraid of messing stuff up.
Think you selected the wrong postyou do realize your elevation stats as measured using GPS will be greater if you are tall and on a larger sized bike
NO!Is the app improving?
Looking at the AppStore it looks like it’s 1-2 months between updates. Feels very slow should be at least monthly. I will stay away a while longer. Will be interesting to hear if Giant left a comment to Rob to talk about in the review. If you can’t do a good app just skip the app totally.
Read the user reviews for the app in the Google Play Store. Most of them still give it one star, only because they can't give it a 0 stars.Looking at the AppStore it looks like it’s 1-2 months between updates. Feels very slow should be at least monthly. I will stay away a while longer. Will be interesting to hear if Giant left a comment to Rob to talk about in the review. If you can’t do a good app just skip the app totally.
Looking at the AppStore it looks like it’s 1-2 months between updates.
This might sounds weird for a person your age.Hi,
If anyone has issues with their Giant App / Bike, please can you detail it here? I'll forward all the details to Giant direct. Please be as specific as possible which may help pinpoint the issue easier.
Thanks
Rob.
Dear Users,
Thank you for using RideControl App and sorry for all the issues you met. All of the issues(including Mail, App Store/Google Play reply, other forum, etc.) will be collected and scheduled into our work-list. We'll fix these step by step, furthermore , we are working on new features and will be presented in the near future.
Best Regards,
Giant RideControl App Developer.
I’m the same age. If you were to use the Soecialized app or BLEvo you’d see the value. Those apps show you important information on your effort vs the motor, and whether you are riding at an efficient cadence, etc. Eventually you get the hang of things and stop obsessing over data and just ride. So, Giant has the same info buried in their data feed and has the same opportunity to create a world class app with the same effort.This might sounds weird for a person your age.
I started pedaling my red/white tricycle 62 years ago.
I do not have any phone since 2000, just my 11YO laptop.
This is my third Ebike.
I never do updates.
Am i being smart?
I have read some updates have bugs.
My 2021 Stance E+ runs perfect since i got it 3 months ago.
Will it self destruct in 9 months because i just pedal and charge?
Or should i ask my LBS to save me and do my updates?
No need to worry i just changed my chain
Thanks for your response. One way to give Giant the best interface in the industry would be to open up the API. Specialized (inadvertently via BLE) did this in the beginning, but they closed it this year. Publishing the bluetooth spec would allow customers to use the Giant app or third party add ons. Have a look at how Sony blew away the competition by publishing the spec for its camera lenses, as an example of how this could benefit Giant and its customers.Dear Users,
Thank you for using RideControl App and sorry for all the issues you met. All of the issues(including Mail, App Store/Google Play reply, other forum, etc.) will be collected and scheduled into our work-list. We'll fix these step by step, furthermore , we are working on new features and will be presented in the near future.
Best Regards,
Giant RideControl App Developer.
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.