Nope .. not you guys ... the elected (or otherwise) muppets ...
For instance :
So Bozzo says you can't come into the UK unless you've had a negative test before you set off ... ok .. Cool .. Sounds sensible ... you don't want variants ...
BUT .. the UK new it had a more transmittable variant in October .. but screw everyone else ... I mean, ok, we'll chew china a new one, but if we have a worse virus derivative ... everyone else can have it right ? Because, well, it might take a tiny bit of effort to stop a global pandemic .. and not make it worse ... What would the world think if we had a new virus strain and said nothing about it for three months ?
What I just don't understand is the simple principle of responsibility ? I know in our modern political world it's all about shirking it, but if you can now test to at least a semi reliable level, infection or not, for someone to be allowed to arrive ? Why can you not take responsibility and do the same for ALL departures ?
Lorries can't leave the UK to Enter France without a negative test because the FRENCH won't let them - surely - as you want to stop a pandemic, ANY country shouldn't let ANYONE LEAVE their borders unless they have a NEGATIVE test ? The UK especially from October on wards should have put this in place and did diddly squat - now it's global.
In fairness, bozzo did nothing to stop it spreading in the UK either - but as he's now King Boris of the Empire and he's finally made himself a bigger fish in a smaller pond, his internal rules and decisions are the UK's - but as he wants to be a global player, you think he'd like to at least play fair with the world as a whole now everyone is equal in his eyes.
For instance :
Covid: UK to close all travel corridors from Monday
Prime Minister Boris Johnson says the action is needed to protect against the risk of new Covid strains.
www.bbc.com
So Bozzo says you can't come into the UK unless you've had a negative test before you set off ... ok .. Cool .. Sounds sensible ... you don't want variants ...
BUT .. the UK new it had a more transmittable variant in October .. but screw everyone else ... I mean, ok, we'll chew china a new one, but if we have a worse virus derivative ... everyone else can have it right ? Because, well, it might take a tiny bit of effort to stop a global pandemic .. and not make it worse ... What would the world think if we had a new virus strain and said nothing about it for three months ?
What I just don't understand is the simple principle of responsibility ? I know in our modern political world it's all about shirking it, but if you can now test to at least a semi reliable level, infection or not, for someone to be allowed to arrive ? Why can you not take responsibility and do the same for ALL departures ?
Lorries can't leave the UK to Enter France without a negative test because the FRENCH won't let them - surely - as you want to stop a pandemic, ANY country shouldn't let ANYONE LEAVE their borders unless they have a NEGATIVE test ? The UK especially from October on wards should have put this in place and did diddly squat - now it's global.
In fairness, bozzo did nothing to stop it spreading in the UK either - but as he's now King Boris of the Empire and he's finally made himself a bigger fish in a smaller pond, his internal rules and decisions are the UK's - but as he wants to be a global player, you think he'd like to at least play fair with the world as a whole now everyone is equal in his eyes.