Which leads to the question how they designed the frame. Normally You design it around a given horizontal top tube length or reach value. Both values are not a straight figure, so it looks like everything just happened by chance 😂
I‘m 183 cm, size L E10.
A good example is the Specialized turbo levo bikes. The have a moderately steep seat angle around 76 deg, but they have a even bigger reach of 502 mm Size S5 (which would be my choice) resulting in a toptube length of 658 mm, almost same as E10 in size L.
I‘m definitely with Johns opinion. The trend towards steeper seat angles may make sense with accoustic bikes and shorter chainstays to support steep climbing. But for Ebikes with long chainstay at 455+ mm and the motor power it’s useless imho. The effect is a too short top tube at same reach...
At least You managed to use the translator, the rest will come with more routine. If something is hard to understand because of translation error, there will be questions and easy clarification. The spirit is very kind in that forum, and we will maintain that! Thanks!
Don’t get me wrong mate, just wanted to give You a hint about the missmatch. Many of us on the forum are on FB as well. And 6.100€ here is not any better then 5.999€ on FB..