Search results

My opinion and experience: China warranty is just an commercial announce. lot of people confuse with their local countries rules. mistake. I have tested several china CPY warranty, someone never answer (mostly sub supplier), or doing nothing, or request you pay the return of the fails product...

th the machined parts (fixation holes) are not painted. the problem now if you doing nothing is that the corrosion will run under paint

i suppose you had riding near (on ?) sea ? mine is lot of less damaged. But I confirm that magnesium case corrodate more quickly than aluminium (not specific at bafang products), i pulverisate WD40 on parts without paints when i assemble the motor. But for those who ride in salted atmosphere, i...

Please share only rev do you have tested and you are sure that able to download to your controller (mention your controller rev end your country location). BAFANG have share with me several rev 3.6 (for M510), only one uploading to my controller. I suspect (whitout any certitude) several...

Hi dave. It the same model: SR P410.48.ST.2.0 (writes on torque sensor). Alike the previous, i can't read his characteristics or calibrate it with the BESST tool. But this one functioning correctely :love:

Problem solved. It was the torque sensor. After exchange motor functioning normally. I'm too happy, this motor is lot of better than the m500 and thank bafang for they support.

You haven't gap between crank arms stop and motor stop with your 3.6 rev ?

I have the 46.7 on mine and it's true L1 is too powerful. I cut the motor under 5% slope and in fact i constat i consume more or less the same than the M500. +-50% consumed for 1200 m D+. Different riding, but not so bad. I keeping the 46.7 14.6 is available on github, have you tried to...

I have changed my torque sensor, but only quickly tested on road. I will perform return to say if problem is solved or not after long MTB ride this week-end.

hi. what is your opinion on road ? we are more than 25 km/h, does the motor "brake" you ?

sorry for my bad english (i"m also not more clear in my language sometime o_O) I whould mean that full power (100%) on pass1 is not the same of pass5, that whould mean that the 100% of the pass1 is in reality allready less percentage than the full power (i'm clear ?). I asked if somebody know...

Bafang agree this solution ?

OK we speak of the same thing. For my part i can only modified seeting of the M510, i can't for my M600. it's you seeting of the M600 ? impossible to apply that on my M510 ? i have an question about about these current limits. Does somebody know exactely at wich current limi coresponding the...

Thanks. Those i don't understand is that when all settled at 100% ? We have various power limit following the level ? That whould mean that 100% at level 1 don't corresponding at the 14 A of the firmware rev, but at lower value. The max A value (100%) in reality can be reach only at level 5.

have you pics of this power level change with BESST pro ? I have last rev of BESST pro and i can adjust current limit percentage for each level, but not the power level ? currrent adjust is applicable on my M510 rev 1.0, not on M500 and 600.

It's why i don't understand their communication. my bad english ?

You use this firmware (dedicated to the M500) on the M510 ?

I have updated the last rev (1.0.4) and i can with it adjust all parameters of my M510 rev 1.0 does somebody can explain me the "current limit percentage". originally all levels are set to 100%. Nevertheless in use it have différencies between motor assist following the levels selected ? I have...

the torque sensor of the M510 (mine ?) is different than M500/600

To complete, my experiency: I have built an "mid" light emtb XC/trail typed , with light carbon frame LCES1075, carbon wheels, light components (but less strong), M510, 15 Ah battery. I 'm +- 100 kg wheight and i need to uphill at less 1000 meter, No way for me to use lighter battery. = +-20.5...