Who, me?
Interesting for sure.
But... #22, #31 & # 39 ?
From a company with the reputation Shimano has with sealed bearing longevity/durability? (and I'm not just talking about their Ebike motor bearings)
er... no thanks
But then I also don't have the difficulties so many seem to have with derailleurs
Patent is (intentionally) vague so I doubt it's all that close to production. More of a territory (pre)marking exercise at this point? Shimano have many patents that never make it to production at all.
Extremely interesting to me not specifically that particular one but manufacturers’ increasing recognition that a derailleur is not the best device to put 100 Nm through on a $15K bike or any bike. Profit margin is one thing but return customers are way more important. Nobody not even people used to carbon road bikes really want to shell out hundreds on new drivetrain bits every few months.
Interesting for sure.
But... #22, #31 & # 39 ?
From a company with the reputation Shimano has with sealed bearing longevity/durability? (and I'm not just talking about their Ebike motor bearings)
er... no thanks
But then I also don't have the difficulties so many seem to have with derailleurs
Patent is (intentionally) vague so I doubt it's all that close to production. More of a territory (pre)marking exercise at this point? Shimano have many patents that never make it to production at all.
100NM doesn't go through the derrailleur. Forces through the derrailleur are tiny and don't change with the addition of a motor. Pedalling torque (power) doesn't go through the derrailleur but through the (upper) chain, cassette sprockets, chainring and freewheel mechainsm(s).manufacturers’ increasing recognition that a derailleur is not the best device to put 100 Nm through
Sorry. But what are you even talking about now?Nobody not even people used to carbon road bikes really want to shell out hundreds on new drivetrain bits every few months.
Gary, you sound like an engineer and a very experienced rider of high powered gearbox bikes. Very interesting points to address but it’s late here.100NM doesn't go through the derrailleur. Forces through the derrailleur are tiny. Pedalling torque (power) doesn't go through the derrailleur but trhough the (upper) chain, cassette sprockets, chainring and freewheel mechainsm(s).
This wonderous gear box still has all of those components taking the torque.
The derrailleur only tensions the (unloaded) lower portion of chain and guides the chain to the correct gear. They're pretty simple and fairly fool mechanisms proof if you have the nouse to set them up properly and visual spacial skills not to smash them into/through obsticles.
I'm yet to see a gearbox design that doesn't cause more drag than a derrailleur system. This (vague as it is) seems no different in that respect.
Sorry. But what are you even talking about now?
I have a carbon road bike. My (105/ultegra) drivetrain generally lasts a good 3000miles... 3000miles in just a few months would mean riding around 50 miles a day every day. perfectly possible to do. but not many carbon roadbike owners will do anywhere near that sort of mileage in such a short time. Derrailleurs will last many tens of thousands of miles with nothing more than basic maintenance and new jockey wheels from time to time.
Do you somehow think the components inside Shimano's box won't wear?
This brings me to another interesting query. Will the gear box be user servicable when it's internal components wear? or will Shimano specify warranty void if opened and that it has to be sent back to distributor for "assessment" and replacement in the same laboriously time consuming way a faulty/worn STEPs motor does when it wears?
Pretty much all of the major rear hub gearboxes over the years at some point, quite a few frame mounted hub based gearboxes and a fair few proper integrated frame gearboxes (mainly Nicolais and Zerodes)Which gearbox bikes have you ridden?
Yes... wheres the motor go? This whole thing only makes sense if there is a motor. else... why waste your time. The ethereal derailleur works perfectly for traditional bike use.Gearbox is in the wrong location...
FTFYTheetherealderailleur works perfectly for traditional and E mountain bike use.
Buy traditional I actually mean those who ride their bikes on trails, electric or otherwise. I typically run behind mine or drag.it around.FTFY
You sound very educated to me.Pretty much all of the major rear hub gearboxes over the years at some point, quite a few frame mounted hub based gearboxes and a fair few proper integrated frame gearboxes (mainly Nicolais and Zerodes)
I'm not an engineer at all. Infact I'm pretty much uneducated. I just have a hell of a lot of experience riding and repairing bicycles and a fairly high quota of common sense.
Yes... wheres the motor go? This whole thing only makes sense if there is a motor. else... why waste your time.
There's room in this one so it's quite possible even likely Shimano can find the room too.No room for motor?
View attachment 21899
I'm on the mailing list for revonte... it's been pretty quiet lately.There's room in this one so it's quite possible even likely Shimano can find the room too.
Revonte work quietly which is a good sign for their motors They now have a partnership with BMZ who in turn have a partnership with Brose. Lots of synergies by the sound of it.I'm on the mailing list for revonte... it's been pretty quiet lately.
Or this?Not such a bad idea ..
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.