Levo Gen 4 Levo Gen 4 - Discussion Thread for 8th April launch


emtbeast

Active member
Jan 10, 2022
394
451
Slovenia
IF the SWAT box could house or be replaced by an extender battery, it would IMO be kinda revolutionary.
Honestly thought about that to, actually this was something that I was looking for someone to implement someday as it gives so much freedom of choice to match your current riding etc...

So the 840Wh battery is a 14S3P configuration pack(42 cells). If they did go with this approach, then following my previous prediction stats:

560Wh is a 14S2P configuration (28 cells).
280Wh Extender is a 14S1P config. (14 cells).

Physically and electricaly it's possible to parallel connect the two later packs into a: 560Wh + 280Wh = 840Wh (14S3P) 42 cell pack the same as the big one.
I won't go into the electrical part of it(there are some limitations and regulations that need to be followed).

The extender can be built into a box type enclosure that would align with the dimensions of the main battery.
The challenges here are creating enclosures for both the 560Wh and the 280Wh extender that match in thickness and width and that the legth of both together isn't longer or maybe slightly longer than the bigger 840Wh.

Looking at the chunky downtube of the new bike it is pointing at this possibility, thicker but shorter battery packs to accommodate the extender with the smaller 560Wh pack.

When you ride the 840Wh there is maybe a tiny bit of SWAT box available or none, if you ride with the 560Wh the whole SWAT box is free, if you ride with the 560 and extender there is no SWAT box available.

If they did this this would be a feature none of other bikes on the market have, it would help to a clean look and stand out as a feature.

Now this also comes with a caveat, they would need to let people choose what type of energy pack they want with the bike at purchase, otherwise I see no advantage for the buyer - except for them, that is selling more batteries and extenders.

✌️
 

teapeaage

Member
Jun 6, 2021
36
14
polandia
Honestly thought about that to, actually this was something that I was looking for someone to implement someday as it gives so much freedom of choice to match your current riding etc...

So the 840Wh battery is a 14S3P configuration pack(42 cells). If they did go with this approach, then following my previous prediction stats:

560Wh is a 14S2P configuration (28 cells).
280Wh Extender is a 14S1P config. (14 cells).

Physically and electricaly it's possible to parallel connect the two later packs into a: 560Wh + 280Wh = 840Wh (14S3P) 42 cell pack the same as the big one.
I won't go into the electrical part of it(there are some limitations and regulations that need to be followed).

The extender can be built into a box type enclosure that would align with the dimensions of the main battery.
The challenges here are creating enclosures for both the 560Wh and the 280Wh extender that match in thickness and width and that the legth of both together isn't longer or maybe slightly longer than the bigger 840Wh.

Looking at the chunky downtube of the new bike it is pointing at this possibility, thicker but shorter battery packs to accommodate the extender with the smaller 560Wh pack.

When you ride the 840Wh there is maybe a tiny bit of SWAT box available or none, if you ride with the 560Wh the whole SWAT box is free, if you ride with the 560 and extender there is no SWAT box available.

If they did this this would be a feature none of other bikes on the market have, it would help to a clean look and stand out as a feature.

Now this also comes with a caveat, they would need to let people choose what type of energy pack they want with the bike at purchase, otherwise I see no advantage for the buyer - except for them, that is selling more batteries and extenders.

✌️
If this had the possibility of only riding on the 280pack when needed (making it 2-3kg lighter, that would be amazing)
 

retrograde

New Member
Apr 1, 2025
7
8
California
That would be cool, but is it verified? I guess the extender would slot in where the swat box is.
When I asked if the extender would mount externally, I was told it also goes into the downtube. I was surprised/skeptical but have no reason to doubt my source. I assume he meant the main and extender batteries would be in there concurrently rather than one-at-a-time. But perhaps you'd be limited to what combinations of different capacity batteries would be allowed (e.g., would 840Wh + extender be supported?). I got a quick glance of a photo of the 840Wh battery but couldn't determine its length.
 

nativeracer

Member
Aug 24, 2019
34
41
California
Not a Brose motor, side-load battery looks clean, and the option left up to the customer to change from class 1 to class 3. Which, if that’s the case, is great news for those of us in the US. It also means the rest of the bike industry will have to follow suit or get left behind in the States. We as consumers should have always had that as an option and not dictated to us by the manufacturers. I personally don’t see consumers buying a bike with a lower speed cut-off when another brand offers something significantly better. Just my two cents.
 

Greeno

New Member
Jul 6, 2024
35
17
San Diego, Cal
As far as the battery pack config goes I think the previous poster #187 was incorrect.
13, not 14 cells in series is correct for 48v.
14 cells is for a 52v system.

My 23’ Levo is 36v with a 700w battery, pretty sure there using 21700 cells and it’s a 10s4p (40).
 

AussieRuss

New Member
Apr 25, 2024
52
73
Australia
Here is the TCU pic I was sent a few weeks ago.
Where is the off/on button or is it touch screen or now done on the handlebar remote?

att.3Z3JgkCC2hSx6o_-DoXyuqE-3r53-LJ0BsqzWsK-xHg.jpeg
 

AussieRuss

New Member
Apr 25, 2024
52
73
Australia
Here is another Question going through my mind.
If the battery is indeed a quick release side load what is the anti theft security?

What stops someone with an Allen key etc walking up to any bike & taking the battery?
Is the battery coded to the bike & will be a brick if stolen?

No doubt that will be explained in a few days but I am wondering.
 

retrograde

New Member
Apr 1, 2025
7
8
California
S-Works vs Pro model - 10NM more power and 54W - will give the Amflow a run for its money. Longevity will be the question as its an inhouse motor design from my understanding.
Longevity ... All the Brose and Bosch tear-down/repair videos out there are pretty revealing. I hope the new motors from Brose (and Bosch) are sealed better than their very recent versions while still allowing for heat dissipation and maintainability - all in what looks to be a smaller housing! There should not be a need for the sealing kits that the motor rebuilders now use - should be in the factory build.

That said, my dealer told me the new motor is a "Brose motor with a Specialized label" implying the design is Brose. If he's wrong, I wonder who at Specialized has the expertise to do motor design? I believe they have a firmware/electronics dev group in Colorado, kinematics and frame design in California, but haven't heard of a motor dev group.
 

luna87824

E*POWAH Master
Subscriber
Jan 19, 2019
474
1,202
Just South of The Grand Canyon
Not a Brose motor, side-load battery looks clean, and the option left up to the customer to change from class 1 to class 3. Which, if that’s the case, is great news for those of us in the US. It also means the rest of the bike industry will have to follow suit or get left behind in the States. We as consumers should have always had that as an option and not dictated to us by the manufacturers. I personally don’t see consumers buying a bike with a lower speed cut-off when another brand offers something significantly better. Just my two cents.
Well, Shimano has had class 3 in the USA for over a year......I have one! And yes......I leave everyone else behind!!
 

HandsomeDanNZ

Well-known member
Subscriber
Jun 16, 2024
272
501
Auckland NZ
Well, Shimano has had class 3 in the USA for over a year......I have one! And yes......I leave everyone else behind!!
My Shimano would also be viewed as a class 3 as it cuts power assist at 45kmh, but I'd hardly say I leave others in my wake. We just don't have the legal restrictions here in NZ.
But I still only have 85nm of torque.
It would be very interesting to have the availability of 101-111nm of torque as well as the "class 3" benefits of higher speed cutoff.
I think then, I could leave people behind...
 

jgusta

Member
Mar 21, 2021
136
59
USA
Like 10 Years ago when I was I saw the Levo gen1 I was like this is pretty cool, but the industry has a long way to go. Fast forward to today, EMTBs they have come a long way using cutting edge technologies which have given us a whole new lease on how we ride. So when I see statements like "revolutionary", I hate to break the news but the "Revolution" has already happen and as such incremental is what you are going to get. There are current engineering limitations (materials / motors / batteries) that limit development in a cost constrained environment. Because of this Revolutions happen less often and Evolutions are the norm. This paradigm is reinforced right here in this thread, as the #1 complaint I see is "to expensive".

Out of curiosity, what would folks in these threads see as a Revolution?
Reliability is the biggest limitation I have seen with owning and riding Emtb’s on the regular over the past +4 years. Just rebuilding a motor was not the solution either.

The new G4 looks built up a bit more so than the previous generation so that should help. However, a meager two year warranty on the motor and battery just doesn’t cut it for those prices in my opinion.
 

DirkWisely

Member
Jun 14, 2024
155
165
California
Reliability is the biggest limitation I have seen with owning and riding Emtb’s on the regular over the past +4 years. Just rebuilding a motor was not the solution either.

The new G4 looks built up a bit more so than the previous generation so that should help. However, a meager two year warranty on the motor and battery just doesn’t cut it for those prices in my opinion.
Then again if you can afford the bike you can afford a replacement motor/battery.
 

retrograde

New Member
Apr 1, 2025
7
8
California
Out of curiosity, what would folks in these threads see as a Revolution?
Not sure about revolutionary, but at the 2025 Taipei Cycle show, one of the booths was showing off a 2.3 Kg, 80nm motor that replaces all the planetary reduction gearing with "magnetic gearing". Advantages are lower friction losses so higher efficiency, fewer gears to wear, and much quieter operation. They said they could hit 90nm next year. Will be exciting to see where this goes and if it gets licensed or bought out.
 

jgusta

Member
Mar 21, 2021
136
59
USA
Then again if you can afford the bike you can afford a replacement motor/battery.
Only bought on heavy closeout discount for my 21’ Rail 9.7 and 22’ Levo Comp. Most all parts replaced eventually on both bikes as things eventually failed and wore out.

Lots of folks with money to burn it sounds, especially those paying for complete Sworks or Pro models at retail. Even Expert too steep unless heavily discounted in my opinion.

Currently, I am eagerly awaiting for my Levo3/Sram broken shock and badly damaged frame warranty claim final outcome myself. So far, Spesh only offering 35% off for frame replacement. Local Sram rep coming to inspect damage and see what they say. Local shop trying to get me Levo4 as replacement. Fingers crossed. I know the only way I could afford one. If not, $2k off for Vala GX AXS locally is very tempting. Going on 3 weeks no ebike (no fun). Ok, descending analog still fun 😁
 
Last edited:

EMTB Forums

Since 2018

The World's largest electric mountain bike community.

576K
Messages
29,357
Members
Join Our Community

Top