Yeah I ran it for one ride and it ran fine. I obviously must of ran it backwards which I didn’t realise at the time. I ended up buying a new bike so I put it all back to standard. It’ll be going back onto my new Kenevo when I get it next week so I’ll let you know how it goes.Do you mounted it ?
Do you have a pic ?Yeah I ran it for one ride and it ran fine. I obviously must of ran it backwards which I didn’t realise at the time. I ended up buying a new bike so I put it all back to standard. It’ll be going back onto my new Kenevo when I get it next week so I’ll let you know how it goes.
Of it on the bike?
Yes[/QUOTE
Give me 5 min I’ll put it back on
OkOk so when I ran it, I had a shorter rear shock so it had one mm clearance on the chain stay. On this bike with the stock suspension it’s just touching.
It definitely fits fine on the 2020 Kenevo
View attachment 24655
Is that your praxxis ring ? If it is, the teeth look different to the ones on mine {so you could mount it either way} it looks to be more like a normal narrow wide rather than the curved and staggered teeth I have ? If you look on the other thread, my first picture shows the standard narrow wide ring interlocked with the new WAVE CURVED teeth.Ok so when I ran it, I had a shorter rear shock so it had one mm clearance on the chain stay. On this bike with the stock suspension it’s just touching.
It definitely fits fine on the 2020 Kenevo
View attachment 24655
Factory and 36T back and front. min the picture it seems to me to be backwards but that’s because the raised bit is on the rear as per yours.Is that your praxxis ring ? If it is, the teeth look different to the ones on mine {so you could mount it either way} it looks to be more like a normal narrow wide rather than the curved and staggered teeth I have ? If you look on the other thread, my first picture shows the standard narrow wide ring interlocked with the new WAVE CURVED teeth.
I think as per your original posts the ebike ring should have the raised bits on the front.
Good point. The Shimano has it mounted on top of/in front of the spider gear rather than behind it like on the brose, Yamaha etc.Nice Checkerplate ..
If the shimano mounts on the other side of the spider, then it would be right for front mount spider rings, but not rear mount spider rings I guess. It does mount, though I guess without the guide lugs, there is the possibility that I could move around.
Yours definitely appears to have traditional narrow wide teeth (so could be mounted either way) with symmetrical teeth and buttressed teeth supports - which is weird as it says "wave" on the ring. Where as all the ones pictured in the other thread have the wave sharks fin teeth and can only mount one way - which has staggered girly skinny teeth which don't seem to feed the chain as nicely in the lower gears.
Pictures please?I've ended up with 2 chain rings - i asked 2 shops to source me one and they have both ordered one in, does anyone want a 36T steel ring in Brisbane/Australia? I've got a a praxis ering 36T and a sram x-sync 2 36T - both steel rings. Else I may test both and just keep one as a spare.
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.