pagheca
Member
Sorry for being off topic, but I know something first person about this and would like to politely respond to this post to avoid further spreading of false information.mmm, and they never have explained why when their chart of global temperatures and Co2 levels that was used to show increased Co2 caused global warming...................was re examined by mathematicians and statisticians ( instead of scientists) and the data placed on properly proportioned X and Y axis, Co2 increases FOLLOWED global temperature increase....not the other way a round!!
First, please mention who and where: I mean the original papers, not some "report" and not a generic "mathematicians and statisticians". Science works with published papers, not with generic opinions spread around on TV or books (or forums....) for the general public.
Second, "mathematicians and statisticians" ARE scientists, and many of them are involved in the IPCC panels and further researches. And atmospheric scientists are very good at reducing data, but they know the phenomena behind it (the greenhouse effect caused by CO2 has been known since 1824).
I am a scientist. And I have been heavily involved in this field for 12 years (then I moved to another, close field but I am still in contact with the atmospheric and climate science communities). Please do not spread false or incomplete information. The life and future of our sons and grandsons are at stake here. It is not a joke.
Thanks.
Last edited: