Hi all, I own a Trek Slash 8 M 2022 and a Trek Fuel EXE 9.8 M 2023. I've run some numbers that I'd like to share on how they compare geometry-wise. Spoiler alert, geo is the same but the travel is 10mm less both ends on the EXe.
The Slash (low) is 170/160 stock and the EXe (low) is 160/152 modified by fork air spring upgrade ($70) and shock stroke increase to 65mm ($0) and the geo has come out practically identical!!! See chart below. FYI the EXe shock mods aren't required and don't change the geo as the eye-to-eye remains unchanged, it's just the fork mod that creates this near-identical geo and trek says 160 is permissible!
Without shock mods it would just be 160/140 travel. And yes, there's a free simple mod to the STOCK SHOCK that anyone can do to change it from 60mm to 65mm but beware the clearance is crazy tight under frame flex and I should only be running 62.5mm stroke/146mm travel to play it safe (but thats a harder mod or a new shock so I'm risking it for now).
The Slash (low) is 170/160 stock and the EXe (low) is 160/152 modified by fork air spring upgrade ($70) and shock stroke increase to 65mm ($0) and the geo has come out practically identical!!! See chart below. FYI the EXe shock mods aren't required and don't change the geo as the eye-to-eye remains unchanged, it's just the fork mod that creates this near-identical geo and trek says 160 is permissible!
Without shock mods it would just be 160/140 travel. And yes, there's a free simple mod to the STOCK SHOCK that anyone can do to change it from 60mm to 65mm but beware the clearance is crazy tight under frame flex and I should only be running 62.5mm stroke/146mm travel to play it safe (but thats a harder mod or a new shock so I'm risking it for now).