Sweeeet!!! - this legislatuion comes from EU law - so after Brexit we can lobby our parliament for 350W and 30MPHSorry, I don't understand your point. Your link sets out what the UK law is now (as I suspect all regular UK posters on this forum are aware), but not why the 250W constant/25kph limit was chosen as the demark between a bicycle and a moped. I've heard a few theories about that (ranging from it was a completely arbitrary choice by a nameless civil servant somewhere through to simple alignment with existing EU law), but that doc does not help to explain how we got to the current regulations.
Is it necessary? Well we could say that about e bikes in general, more power and more speed = more fun - thats what its all about for me.Don't hold your breath, and is it really necessary anyway?
Thats just nasty
Ashamed to admit that could be my doppelgänger
Why would we lobby for 350w and 30MPH?
I want my ebike to replicate the experience of a normal mtb with a level of assistance.
If we go to that level you may as well buy an electric off-road bike and be done with it, if we all run out of battery now those things would last an hour.
This seems a sure fire way of getting restricted riding in place , insurance etc and a grater focus on ebike usage.
Seems a real bad idea to me, I want to ride my bike in the wilds of the Peak District not travel to a defined bike park.
Dangerous?in my opinion a 15.5mph limit is way too slow and in fact dangerous if you are going to be using your bike on public roads
There are two situations I was getting into regularly on my 14-mile commute: #1 was when traffic is backed up and I need to get into the turn lane across 2 lanes of traffic going straight. I need to match up to 25 mph or I'm risking my life. #2 is getting across a highway entrance ramp where there is a constant stream of traffic. After just about getting killed a couple of times, I looked into an aftermarket "accessory" that solves that problem and that has made things so much more safe.
this is a perfect example of the consequences of laws that don't consider the real world conditions that cyclists encounter.
No.You need a licence now to ride anything powered faster than 25kph.
No.
You need a license to ride anything powered over 25kph. Massive difference.
Dangerous?
The motors limit doesn't stop you pedalling to higher speeds simply stops assisting you. it's the stupidly heavy bicycle and the stupidly slow rolling resistance of big fat soft super sticky tyres most Emtbers feel when they break the 15mph barrier and the assistance cuts out. The effect is far less so on a lighter road going Ebike withroad tyres for road use.
A fit cyclist on a regular road bike can average 17-23mph easily on the flat but the same cyclist will struggle to hold 15mph on any significantly long ascents.
You're clearly a very inexperienced cyclist. and a danger to yourself and other road users.
Do yourself a favour. Stay off the highway. it's a bicycle. not a motor vehicle. and should be ridden accordingly
No it really isn't. real world cyclists don't survive very long if they try to ride and change lane across 2 lane highways in the way motor vehicles can.
sorry. Not having highways in the UK I don't actually know what this is... but...#2 is getting across a highway entrance ramp where there is a constant stream of traffic.
Tells me you should stay away from them.After just about getting killed a couple of times
After just about getting killed a couple of times
sorry. Not having highways in the UK I don't actually know what this is... but...
Tells me you should stay away from them.
Top condition Cat1 competitive road cyclists average what? 20-23mph riding alone on the flat
average club road cyclists 17-20mph
mountainbikes/commuters 12-15mph
a rough guide but hopefully you get where I'm coming from here
You seriously do not need your bike assisted to 25mph for safety riding in the same situation as un assisted bicycles. you need to ride more safely in the first place.
ie planning ahead and possibly even getting off and walking across lanes at a crossing if needs be. ie. ..
Yes, very true and I completely agree. I wish I had storage space for another bike but it would have to sit outside in the rain.It sounds like you're using the wrong tool for the job. Pedelec/class1 is a mild ebike that can access infrastructure for bikes or even pedestrians. And trails. There are lots of other options that better for riding at higher speeds in traffic. For obvious reason we don't want those, nor a tuned class1/pedelec on non motorized infrastructure.
How does the haibike flyon with 120nm of output stay within the 250w limit?
True, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the TQ motor isn’t putting out a higher peak power. Remember the 250W is a max continuous rating, not the peak - all the current power systems are capable of outputting much more than this for short periods, but the software on board ensures that they will not exceed the 250W continuous unless derestricted.Its marketing BS. More torque = slower output shaft. If they wanted to quote 240nm they could just reduce the motor output shaft speed by half. The important number is 250w which is set by law.
True, but it is in the interests of every manufacturer to maximise peak output within the law. IHMO haibike are trying to mislead by quoting a torque number which can be manupulated easily- bless their cotton socks.True, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the TQ motor isn’t putting out a higher peak power. Remember the 250W is a max continuous rating, not the peak - all the current power systems are capable of outputting much more than this for short periods, but the software on board ensures that they will not exceed the 250W continuous unless derestricted.
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.