Isn't the real point here that its great we have the choice? I can see the benefits of both bikes, some riders will prefer a mimimally assisted platform and some will love blasting around in turbo all the time, there is no right or wrong, better or worse.
I dont actually think the SL is at all about people who still want to put more effort in than on a FF, what its actually built for is being great on the trails and downhill, as they are trying to build a more manoeuvrable, lighter bike, and the compromise is less power. Of course this means it works for those who aren't bothered about having higher assistance options too, but its not the reason they built it.
I wouldn't say that when I see Bernard Kerr, Oli Wilkins and Brendog blasting around the Surrey Hills on their "full fat" EMTB's that they are compensating for fitness, no they just love them for having fun.
Pretty much every "serious" rider I know with an EMTB likes them because they get to shred more downhill, and get more runs in in less time.
IMO to ride something like a Kenevo really well, which even in the world of EMTB's is a big old boat, you actually have to be really fit and strong, because it aint easy moving that kind of weight around.
If anything a bike like the SL is actually going to be easier for many people who are not that fit to ride, because of its weight - assistance is assistance and at the end of the day any sort of motor turns mere mortals into Nino Schurter up the hills.
Personally I prefer something in the middle, lighter full fat EMTB still has the edge for me, none of the lightweight options out there right now have any appeal to me in terms of the geometry or specifications, except for potentially the Nox Helium, but no way I would drop that kind of money without a testride
I dont actually think the SL is at all about people who still want to put more effort in than on a FF, what its actually built for is being great on the trails and downhill, as they are trying to build a more manoeuvrable, lighter bike, and the compromise is less power. Of course this means it works for those who aren't bothered about having higher assistance options too, but its not the reason they built it.
I wouldn't say that when I see Bernard Kerr, Oli Wilkins and Brendog blasting around the Surrey Hills on their "full fat" EMTB's that they are compensating for fitness, no they just love them for having fun.
Pretty much every "serious" rider I know with an EMTB likes them because they get to shred more downhill, and get more runs in in less time.
IMO to ride something like a Kenevo really well, which even in the world of EMTB's is a big old boat, you actually have to be really fit and strong, because it aint easy moving that kind of weight around.
If anything a bike like the SL is actually going to be easier for many people who are not that fit to ride, because of its weight - assistance is assistance and at the end of the day any sort of motor turns mere mortals into Nino Schurter up the hills.
Personally I prefer something in the middle, lighter full fat EMTB still has the edge for me, none of the lightweight options out there right now have any appeal to me in terms of the geometry or specifications, except for potentially the Nox Helium, but no way I would drop that kind of money without a testride
Last edited: