- Thread starter
- #61
How did they compare? Its been a challenge finding unbiased opinions. Most of the reviews say "they are both good"
I think that’s exactly the thing Dax, they really are both excellent bikes, and there isn’t a great deal in it. The Levo is slightly more nimble probably due to the shorter and therefore stiffer-feeling suspension (the geometry is fairly close/similar), which was actually a big attraction to the Levo. But the Kenevo is no juggernaught, although it does feel ‘bigger’ but that could be as simple as the slightly wider bars. A point of note actually, I only rode the Levo Carbon, so it was also a fair bit lighter than the Kenevo (he did quote how much, but I can't remember, 700g??).
I do feel as though I could do pretty much anything on the Kenevo that I could do on the Levo (which is the Ebike leveller that attracted me this way in the first place), but I wouldn’t be able to do everything on the Levo quite as well as the Kenevo (gravity stuff). And that’s how my logic partly swung it. I think on the Levo I would occasionally wish I had the Kenevo but I'm confident I won’t wish I’d swung to the Levo.
If you’re not (or rarely) doing any serious narly DH stuff, I would probably recommend the Carbon Levo.
What did shock me is how different they feel compared to my old Stumpjumper, they feel huge compared to that (I'm talking about my old Stumpy from about 10 years ago mind you and I know they got 'bigger' in recent years), which could also be partly psychological due to looking down at that massive 2.8 tyre? Dunno.
I absolutely wouldn’t be disappointed with either, the Öhlins and 150mm dropper on the Kenevo did help sway me, as well as of course the bigger travel which suits my style a lot more.
It’s definitely horses for courses, both amazing bikes.
Thanks again for all the advice, can't wait to meet some of you on a group ride soon.