I respect what you're doing & was considering a similar thing to ride when my wife rides my bike but prepare for incoming when you show it with the motor hanging down ready to be busted off.
So clearly not the original owner then?ridden by a kid (literally like 13 years old)...
The only similarity in geometry between the old Kona being discussed and a modern trail bike is head angleOld DH bikes geometries are today not unsimilar to that of modern day Emtb Trail bike
That's pretty amazing!most conversions of any reasonable old faithful will be around 16 - 17 kilos ) and will be a great entry level EBike.
No worries.Gents. Lets try to keep this as a civilised conversation without inflaming anyone please.
No. We actually weren't. The thread was about a 2012 Kona operator the OP had bought cheaply with the idea of converting with a motor kit. And I think you will find all information I have given is relevant to that bike alone. (just incase you missed it my 50deg seattube angle comment was a v.slight exageration, but all I said about it stands true regardless).we are talking rehashing and recycling old retirees that are sitting in the back of the shed
Again just to put the record straight. *sigh*by the way I want to see a vid of you pulling a cadence of over 200 for more than 5 minutes up an 15% incline as you claim or it doesn’t happen
Umm it would seem my use of the wordsJust to put the record straight
Would indicate I was referencing a generalisation and not exclusively the Kona DH’s.Old DH bikes geometries are today not unsimilar to that of modern day Emtb Trail bike, slack head angles, long wheelbase, some with a relatively long reach. Who really cares if they don’t peddle up hill because of the seat position, neither do the early generation EBikes where without an active motor on board they are just like cycling in mud, after all that’s why you have a motor.
Maybe there aren't many that can be bothered with powering up a 'still good after all these years' recycled bike but you can't blame them if they have the money to buy a new purpose built shiny one. I, on the other hand really enjoy seeing something redesigned, rebuilt or repurposed.Ah well I‘m done on this subject, the forum readers here seem to be more interested in the latest and greatest rather than recycling what were very good bikes just a few years ago. There are other forums where conversions are talked about with more shall we say open minds.
Maybe there aren't many that can be bothered with powering up a 'still good after all these years' recycled bike but you can't blame them if they have the money to buy a new purpose built shiny one. I, on the other hand really enjoy seeing something redesigned, rebuilt or repurposed.
With regards to the OP I am not sure if I'm sorry that he hasn't decided to carry on as I put myself in his place & would rather start on something else that may be a better candidate than to carry on, spend a lot of money & end up with something that doesn't work that well. I have no experience repowering a bike but have researched for my own interest & have come back to the opinion that I don't think it is economically viable.
I respect your input re if the motors get banged up or damaged. I think what is lacking in this DIY forum are examples of repowered bikes (rather than the Dengfu) & their successes or failures. If you do really care then post some pics of your creations - I'd be interested in seeing them, as most of the ones I google are either hideous things built with cordless drill chargers attached or rather pedestrian commuters.
I personally find the rebooted Intense the most interesting & hottest looking bike on this forum (no disrespect to other builders).
Finally regarding members that wind you up - They're out there & they won't go away . There is an ignore function you can use to block them. You can't changer the wind but you can change the direction of your sail.
Keep on posting
What battery and bag did you go with? I may do a conversion on my wife's bike at some point and as an extra small, its triangle is too small for most full sized batteries on the market.We have found a better battery bag since this photo and the battery is now down in the lower part of the front triangle.
Yes. One of the motors I would consider for the above is the Tongsheng TSDZ2: TONGSHENG TSDZ2are any of the £500 kits torque sensing with the option to alter assistance limit (to say 28-32mph) and a decent sized battery (500wh ish)?
Gary you need to go back to school and learn to read posts before rushing in and complaining of battery bags being up high, I seem to recall writing something about the battery bag being now in the triangle. Considering the weight of a dropper seat post which you complain of me not having ( how many riders really use a seat post all of the time or even some of the time ? ) v a carbon seat post and a 260Wh battery there’s only 1 pint in it + my fat lardy arse and I guess in the riding I do, it’s not going to matter 1 jot where the perfect location is.Genuine question with no piss taking at all.
Why have you fitted the heavy battery in a bag hanging from the highest possible position when there looks to be ample room in the front frame triangle closer to the BB (and motor) ?
moving it there would undoubtably improve the bikes handling and reduce the spiders web of cabling.
it's almost as if you've gone out of your way to route the cables as badly as possible to troll the internet
Ok. with that last bit I am taking the piss a little.
And talking of re-purposing old bikes, the one upgrade that properly changes any old mountain bike bike for the better is a dropper post.
You should start a thread about your experience converting bikes cheaply... it'd be interesting.
also, are any of the £500 kits torque sensing with the option to alter assistance limit (to say 28-32mph) and a decent sized battery (500wh ish)?
Yup the TSDZ2 seems to hang low and look like it’s going to be wiped out on the first twig. In practice out in the real world you seem to strike the pedals long before the motor and we seem to be having no issue with motor damage from impact. Bare in mind all our riding is XCountry riding but it’s pretty knarly around here and plenty of branches down on the trails.When standing next to the other manufactured emtbs you ride with is your motor noticeably lower than theirs? Have you had any hits to the motor & if it did hit are they pretty robust? I'm hearing what you say about the visual look of the new bikes hiding the motor but Jeez they do stick out like the proverbial?
I'd love to power up my trance since I put a lot of love into it before getting the Rail but as you explained in another post the BB isn't right
Everything is a compromise, sure you may have a lower under carriage than you had previously but in reality in your riding style how often did you hit your 36T crank ring ?That's a good point. One of the things that drew me to the E06 frame for my bike is they tuck the big motor upward nicely:
View attachment 62124
For my wife's bike, she's not going to go over anything too rough so it shouldn't be an issue.
Don’t be peeved. BB height and ground clearance have never been the same thing even with non-ebikes. Ground clearance in those bikes depends on the size (diameter) of the chainring.It’s one of my pet peeves that everyone measures to the centre line of the pedals and not actual ground clearance. One only has to look at the latest Yamaha and the Flyon engines to see that the actual ground clearance is a lot less than BB height.
View attachment 62123
I'm going through old post for my first conversion and posts like yours and others are providing a wealth of information.Ah well I‘m done on this subject, the forum readers here seem to be more interested in the latest and greatest rather than recycling what were very good bikes just a few years ago. There are other forums where conversions are talked about with more shall we say open minds.
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.