tomato paste
Active member
I'm hoping there are some smarter more experienced folks here that have an answer.
I'm building a trail for beginners (we have none here), and I had thought I had chosen a fairly mellow but intelligent line through the woods, which I proceeded to clear. After a brief rough in, I tried riding it, and found I am not accelerating, I decelerate to a stop and must pedal through it all. Obviously as the line is benched and compacted, friction should decrease, and I should see more acceleration. But does anyone have a good rule of thumb on how to judge whether a line may be 'not steep enough'?
If I calculate the gradient per short section, I'm seeing stuff like this:
20m, 4%
5m, -1% (upslope)
20m, 6%
15m, 0% (flat)
5m, -1% (upslope)
40m, 2%
And, I'm starting to think, regardless of how compacted I can get the dirt, this thing may actually be much too mellow, and the sections where I though I'd bleed off speed are irrelevant because people won't be going fast enough. Anyone have insight to offer?
I'm building a trail for beginners (we have none here), and I had thought I had chosen a fairly mellow but intelligent line through the woods, which I proceeded to clear. After a brief rough in, I tried riding it, and found I am not accelerating, I decelerate to a stop and must pedal through it all. Obviously as the line is benched and compacted, friction should decrease, and I should see more acceleration. But does anyone have a good rule of thumb on how to judge whether a line may be 'not steep enough'?
If I calculate the gradient per short section, I'm seeing stuff like this:
20m, 4%
5m, -1% (upslope)
20m, 6%
15m, 0% (flat)
5m, -1% (upslope)
40m, 2%
And, I'm starting to think, regardless of how compacted I can get the dirt, this thing may actually be much too mellow, and the sections where I though I'd bleed off speed are irrelevant because people won't be going fast enough. Anyone have insight to offer?