Interesting, www.olympiacicli.it have just released a potential game changer, a 900wh battery with a range of 290 kilometres and it weighs the same as a 625wh battery.
Record lightness
. PowerNine 900Wh does not affect the overall weight of the bicycle: its weight is the same as that of a 630Wh battery produced according to earlier technology.
More capacity, same footprint
They then state on the actual bike spec webpage. To achieve the outstanding capacity of 900Wh, thanks to which this product ranks far above the average, 50 automotive-derived cells were used; despite these enhanced specifications, the battery occupies virtually the same space as any integrated battery.
So it sounds like it's not even any smaller at all, they're simply proud of the patern they arranged the cells in inside their downtube and the downtubes profile.The 50 cells develop the outstanding capacity of 900Wh taking up virtually the same space as a common integrated battery, thanks to a careful arrangement of the cells resulting in a very harmonious, compact sized slanted tube shape.
I agree with the weight issue, still, it's good to see other brands, I have never heard of Olympia, developing larger capacity batteries, it may not be perfect, but what is when it comes to eBike technology as it moves so quickly, but they are at least pushing what is possible, its not all about Specialized etc.As I often do long and unplanned rides, I think this is some the best news for eMTB for a long time
I also often do the 2x20 km transfer from home til trails at the eMTB. But then I have to be easy on the power and use ECO. With 900w I can still ride the trails for hours
It's like the old days, where You have to charge You iPhone during the day - but now You only need nighttime charging. I want a 900w battery now - and a spare 350w for days at the bike park.
Only worry that the bike is becoming to heavy
Totally agree, last month I sold my Specialized Levo Expert, this month I have sold my Pivot Shuttle, I'm now back on my analogue Ibis Hd4 and loving it, the one thing the e-bikes did for me was massively increase my cardio, I had a Rocky Mountain Altitude Powerplay on order for next month but have cancelled it purely because I'm loving my analogue riding, that's not to say I'm done with e-bikes but I'm going to wait 12 months to see how much they progress, if at all, before taking the plunge again, enjoy your riding.Stuffing frames full of moar and moar battery and weight is a regression as far as I'lm concerned.
I'm riding and enjoying my normal bikes more and more because I'm simply no longer enjoying the downsides of the excess weight of my Eeb. and it's one of the lightest of the shimano motored FS Eebs you'll find.
The hype and knock-on *need* effect of the new 630wh batteries has gotten pretty much every manufacturer trying to increase range.
I'm personally not interested in adding a kilo to ANY bike if I can help it and would honestly rather climb the extra 900ft the increased battery would give with my motor switched off.
Whilst riding locally this morning, Ilkley Moor, I saw 2 E riders just cycling, no body language no bike craft / skill, they were just spinning like hamsters, I looked at my pal and asked if thats how we looked only a few weeks ago, he said that we had more input but generally, yes, I just said, how fucking dull, long live the analogue.Ebikes reduced my fitness (but cardio less than top end)
You can stop referring to your Ibis as "analogue" now.
Best bike I've ever ridden, it's my third, I crossed to the electric side for a while but I much prefer the original freedom of Mountain Biking and the associated fun.Please stop calling your bike that? It makes me cringe (for you*)
Emtb riders riding like styless pies is definitely a common sight.
but so is short(er) riders on fashionably loooong (sometimes XL) bikes they can't control properly.
Mtb (E or not) is a fashion parade
*not just because it's an Ibis
Yeah, good questions. This has to be made with the 5000mAh 21700 cells (3,6V*5Ah*50=900Wh)Funnily enough their claim of weighing the same as a 630wh battery doesn't actually state a weight...
What "earlier technology" are they even refering to?
They then state on the actual bike spec webpage
So it sounds like it's not even any smaller at all, they're simply proud of the patern they arranged the cells in inside their downtube and the downtubes profile.
The actual battery looks to be pretty damn huge
Using basic arithmetic a 900wh battery made up from 50 cells (...)
That was taken 6 years ago, we wether well in Yorkshire, something in the water or ?But... who's the young boy band member in your Avitar?
If that's the case then is the weight more likely to be around 75g per cell?Yeah, good questions. This has to be made with the 5000mAh 21700 cells (3,6V*5Ah*50=900Wh)
For me .. it would be the 630 .... but I know no better ..I honestly think I'd prefer the latter.
Try riding them insteadI picked up a couple of mates carbon nancy bikes a couple of days ago .. they felt like little childrens bikes ..
The Samsung 50E is 69g. And one could argue it's a 4900mAh rather than a 5000mAh cell.If that's the case then is the weight more likely to be around 75g per cell?
ie. putting my wild guess wildly out and this battery closer to ~3750g for the 900wh and 50 cells?
With lighter cells, an interesting quandry for me would be whether i'd prefer 630wh for a similar weight to a 504wh battery or a 500g lighter 504wh battery. I honestly think I'd prefer the latter.
I'm not sure why the weight has increased. When I asked Giant about their pretty heavy Energypak, they said the battery did not contribute to frame rigidity, their bikes could be ridden w/o the battery. I wanna ask Shimano about this too, but they launched their new batteries without inviting anyoneI always though the internal batteries weighed more because they needed to have more structure to deal with the frame flex, some of them are almost used like structural members in the down tubes.
TBF it must depend on the particular frame design. An eternal battery mounted on the top of a downtube is almost never going to be struck while riding unless a full on tumble where the bike lands on it's side into debris.I always though the internal batteries weighed more because they needed to have more structure to deal with the frame flex, some of them are almost used like structural members in the down tubes.
Exactly, most of them form the bottom of the downtube so to speak, so must need extra bulk as a resultTBF it must depend on the particular frame design. An eternal battery mounted on the top of a downtube is almost never going to be struck while riding unless a full on tumble where the bike lands on it's side into debris.
The bike featured in this thread's "internal" (it's not really fully internal, is it?) battery case runs the full line of the underside of the bikes downtube. ie. right in the firing line for any rock flung up by the front tyre. that surely needs to be tougher (heavier) than a plastic external battery case.
Must be frame specific, or not, the Lapierre e Zesty can be ridden as an e-bike, or, remove the motor and the battery and it's back to a regular bike, what fills the whole, nothing but a plastic cover, which by the way then let's you utilise the battery space to stash drinks, tools or whatever takes your fancy.Exactly, most of them form the bottom of the downtube so to speak, so must need extra bulk as a result
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.