Santa
Member
I mean, I like the geo on this bike, it strikes a good balance as a descent smasher while maintaining good agility and lightness on the trails, but I don't understand why they are charging so much for it.
Looking at the Rail 9.7 which is about 8,500$ Canadian, for around the same price you can get the Norco Sight VLT 29 (C2). The geo is very similar, yet you'll get a Lyric Fork (instead of a Yari), a Super Deluxe shock (instead of a Deluxe) XT brakes (instead of the entry level Shimanos), XT derailler instead of a SRAM NX, great tires (DHF/DHR) instead of those light XR5 tires that you'll bust on the first tech trail.
Heck, even the Turbo Levo Carbon Comp (about the same price as the Rail 9.7) has better components (better fork, better brakes, better tires...) and a bigger battery (700 vs 630).
And we won't even begin to compare to what you get with a direct to consumer brand like YT.
So what am I missing here? I really like the Rail, but I just can't justify paying so much and getting second-grade components.
Looking at the Rail 9.7 which is about 8,500$ Canadian, for around the same price you can get the Norco Sight VLT 29 (C2). The geo is very similar, yet you'll get a Lyric Fork (instead of a Yari), a Super Deluxe shock (instead of a Deluxe) XT brakes (instead of the entry level Shimanos), XT derailler instead of a SRAM NX, great tires (DHF/DHR) instead of those light XR5 tires that you'll bust on the first tech trail.
Heck, even the Turbo Levo Carbon Comp (about the same price as the Rail 9.7) has better components (better fork, better brakes, better tires...) and a bigger battery (700 vs 630).
And we won't even begin to compare to what you get with a direct to consumer brand like YT.
So what am I missing here? I really like the Rail, but I just can't justify paying so much and getting second-grade components.