you really believe they test these bikes till failure?Reliability? Warranty? How long to replace failed motor under warranty? How repair failed motor out of warranty/possible? Can failed out of warranty motor be replaced? Cost of repair/replacement? Etc.
So many questions, so few answers ...
This is the kind of stuff I’d actually like to see but none of the big reviewers will show it, they don’t want to bite the hand that feeds them.Reliability? Warranty? How long to replace failed motor under warranty? How repair failed motor out of warranty/possible? Can failed out of warranty motor be replaced? Cost of repair/replacement? Etc.
So many questions, so few answers ...
Reliability? Warranty? How long to replace failed motor under warranty? How repair failed motor out of warranty/possible? Can failed out of warranty motor be replaced? Cost of repair/replacement? Etc.
So many questions, so few answers ...
No, of course not, but when making comparisons these are major issues which should be discussed.you really believe they test these bikes till failure?
Yep, you got it. If these guys or some other group tested these bikes to failure to see how the repair, replace, and warranty issues were handled, don't we think that the companies would jump through hoops to insure the service/warranty issues were handled? Therefore we'd have no real example of how that company would handle the "normal" customer's issues. So there's that.To be fair that's impossible for them to test, they could just regurgitate what the bike companies tell them and even then that will only apply to a particular part of the world.
I find these shootouts great to identify the best riding bikes (orbea wild and canyon striven), then you need to go into he forums here to check for issues, which all ebikes are riddled with.
How would they perform these tests? It would take years in some instances and by that time the bike/motor they are testing has been superceeded. Also warrantee and local support is very localised based on how good the local country distributor behaves.This is the kind of stuff I’d actually like to see but none of the big reviewers will show it, they don’t want to bite the hand that feeds them.
You heard of GOOGLEReliability? Warranty? How long to replace failed motor under warranty? How repair failed motor out of warranty/possible? Can failed out of warranty motor be replaced? Cost of repair/replacement? Etc.
So many questions, so few answers ...
No, what's that?You heard of GOOGLE
Well, at least they were trying to test the service and warranty aspects of the motor.lol, they were pressure washing the bikes daily. In 6 months all those motors are going to be extra crunchy.
You are right but very little discussion on how different the systems are.What do you mean? there was also sram in the propain and the rocky mountain with the dyname motor, giant with the yamaha
Yes but to be fair, I'm not very concerned with how hard it is to service the suspension and drivetrain/brakes on the bike. I care how it rides, corners, jumps, and descends... That's what the loam wolf guys are good at and that's what I care aboutI think they are just riders and not very technical. Ask them if they have rebuilt a grip 2.1 damper or even a dropper post and my guess is they take the bike to the shop for that. I just spent the afternoon changing out the oil in my DHX shock, I would guess none of them could do that.
Good point. There are tons of Youtube vids on how to perform very detailed service functions, so bike test/comparison vids should focus on what they're good at.Yes but to be fair, I'm not very concerned with how hard it is to service the suspension and drivetrain/brakes on the bike. I care how it rides, corners, jumps, and descends... That's what the loam wolf guys are good at and that's what I care about
Let me Google that…You heard of GOOGLE
You do realise they ride what they are given my manufacturers? If there is a bike missing it will be because one was not supplied/available at the time of testing.I enjoy these guys and their reviews, but I have to say I was disappointed this year. I realize the Specialized Turbo Levo has been out for a while, but to not include a single model of the most sold Ebike in an annual Ebike review severally reduces the reviews relevancy. Where I’m from north of Atlanta, GA, I’ll bet 7-8 out of ever 10 e-bikes are turbo Levos. It’s easier to understand a comparison to something you’re familiar with, and I’d submit most e-bikers have some kind of exposed to a turbo Levo. Like in firearms, comparing any handgun to a Glock is helpful, because most people into firearms have used a Glock somewhere along the way. It gives a frame of reference to the largest amount of Interisted participants. Some of the bikes they reviewed I’ve never heard of, and the large majority I would never have the chance to sit on before purchasing.
While its true all models/mfrs don’t get included I think they’re just trying to review new models from newer brands or newer tech.You do realise they ride what they are given my manufacturers? If there is a bike missing it will be because one was not supplied/available at the time of testing.
That's probably the case. I know Loam Wolf did a couple of fairly extensive Trek Rail tests with his crew, so info is out there. Our shop is fortunate enough to have Specialized, Trek, and Santa Cruz brands. We've sold various emtb models in these brands, all with very satisfied customers. Honestly...they all work pretty darned well. The Brose motor issue in Spec does come up more frequently so far compared to the Bosch and Shimano, but we haven't had the SC brand as long.While its true all models/mfrs don’t get included I think they’re just trying to review new models from newer brands or newer tech.
Here in SF Bay area home brands like Specialized and Santa Cruz are pretty common and riders are often looking into newer concepts
Do you realize they‘ve done multiple reviews on turbo Levos and even gave it their best bike award so should know enough about one to make a comparison?You do realise they ride what they are given my manufacturers? If there is a bike missing it will be because one was not supplied/available at the time of testing.
That's not how a shootout works. They test bikes back to back. Remembering a bike they tested 6 months ago or 12 months ago is not a fair or relevant test.Do you realize they‘ve done multiple reviews on turbo Levos and even gave it their best bike award so should know enough about one to make a comparison?
The World's largest electric mountain bike community.