Jeffsy29
Member
Everyone laughs about "E-bike" rated lube, seats, grips, valve-caps and tire levers.....who doesn't enjoy a good chuckle at eMTB Marketing Gone Wild??
I've been conversing with a *very* helpful and patient Tech Support rep from Fox, but no matter what fork I seem to discuss, they seem to have a hard-and-fast response of:
From my experience, and from what I've read, there seems to be very minor tuning differences limited to either damping or volume reducers between 'standard' and 'E-rated' Fox forks. And in some cases, not in the direction that I'd prefer (I'd like fewer spacers and less compression damping please).
For example, the Fox 36E+ on my stock Decoy29 is essentially a 34 inside so that the tube walls can run thicker. Sure, this helps stiffness a little, but so would a thinner-walled 38mm tube! 36E+ also comes with 4 spacers vs 2 spacers in the standard 36. What on the 36E+ is any better than it's standard brother Fox 36? Nothing that I know of, unless you want an extra 2 spacers. Upgrade path is much pretty dead-end on 36E+.
I was flat-out advised against the Bomber Z1 Coil by Fox since it's "not E-rated", though the Z1 chassis is probably robust enough to deal with my portly 270-275 lb. kitted-gear rider weight. (spring rate is another matter, however).
When I asked Fox Tech Support about Fox 38 vs. 38E+ differences, they said "talk to your local bike shop". Thanks Fox...... I've read elsewhere it's just slight damping differences. But I find the 36E+ HSC and LSC too stiff even in wide-open position. I'm inclined to go for the Standard 38 for some adjustment head-room so I can actually tighten HSC and LSC down somewhere in the middle as proposed in the Fox tuning guide. I have a standard 38 on back-order at the moment - against Fox's advice. I guess I can always jam a Smashpot coil in there if I need more suppleness.
Is there any real benefit to an E-rated fork?, or is it likely just more hooey than anything? I don't see anyone taking the time/money to reinforce their crowns/steerer tubes on E-bike forks like Fox has on the 38 oval steerer. That would be something tangible that one could claim as 'stronger' than the standard version. The rest of the E-rating on forks seems a bit dubious or at least, less important as a bike-stressor than rider weight and riding style. The +15-20 lbs of an E-bike pales in comparison to +100 lbs of variation amongst bike riders.
I've been conversing with a *very* helpful and patient Tech Support rep from Fox, but no matter what fork I seem to discuss, they seem to have a hard-and-fast response of:
"For your bike/rider configuration...we highly recommend the E-tuned fork"
OR
"I would caution you as the Z1 isn't rated for ebikes"
OR
"We don't have a coil e bike fork at this time".
OR
"I would caution you as the Z1 isn't rated for ebikes"
OR
"We don't have a coil e bike fork at this time".
From my experience, and from what I've read, there seems to be very minor tuning differences limited to either damping or volume reducers between 'standard' and 'E-rated' Fox forks. And in some cases, not in the direction that I'd prefer (I'd like fewer spacers and less compression damping please).
For example, the Fox 36E+ on my stock Decoy29 is essentially a 34 inside so that the tube walls can run thicker. Sure, this helps stiffness a little, but so would a thinner-walled 38mm tube! 36E+ also comes with 4 spacers vs 2 spacers in the standard 36. What on the 36E+ is any better than it's standard brother Fox 36? Nothing that I know of, unless you want an extra 2 spacers. Upgrade path is much pretty dead-end on 36E+.
I was flat-out advised against the Bomber Z1 Coil by Fox since it's "not E-rated", though the Z1 chassis is probably robust enough to deal with my portly 270-275 lb. kitted-gear rider weight. (spring rate is another matter, however).
When I asked Fox Tech Support about Fox 38 vs. 38E+ differences, they said "talk to your local bike shop". Thanks Fox...... I've read elsewhere it's just slight damping differences. But I find the 36E+ HSC and LSC too stiff even in wide-open position. I'm inclined to go for the Standard 38 for some adjustment head-room so I can actually tighten HSC and LSC down somewhere in the middle as proposed in the Fox tuning guide. I have a standard 38 on back-order at the moment - against Fox's advice. I guess I can always jam a Smashpot coil in there if I need more suppleness.
Is there any real benefit to an E-rated fork?, or is it likely just more hooey than anything? I don't see anyone taking the time/money to reinforce their crowns/steerer tubes on E-bike forks like Fox has on the 38 oval steerer. That would be something tangible that one could claim as 'stronger' than the standard version. The rest of the E-rating on forks seems a bit dubious or at least, less important as a bike-stressor than rider weight and riding style. The +15-20 lbs of an E-bike pales in comparison to +100 lbs of variation amongst bike riders.