Twisted Fork
Member
Long time lurker, first time poster here…
I have noticed that most advocates of a mullet setup seem to point to advantages for enduro style riding in terms of responsiveness and agility.
It seems to me that many of the perceived advantages might cross over to a more trail oriented style of riding, but I rarely hear it mentioned. The slightly lower wheel weight, lower rotational mass, less “butt buzz” on the steep rock rolls, and lower crank-to-ground effective gearing ratio from the smaller wheel circumference would, at fist thought, seem to be advantageous for aggressive trail riding as well.
I currently ride a dual 27.5” Giant Trance E, 160/140, predominantly all-mountain/trail style on forested single track with regular forays into cross country and chunky alpine routes. Still lots of heavy chunder, steep rutted fall lines, drops and jumps that would probably put me into a light enduro style of riding as well. I may only spend a couple of days per year at lift-assisted bike parks where the Trance seems to perform quite adequately for my current skill level.
I’m looking into adding a trail oriented SL style bike to the fleet, such as a Trek Fuel Ex-e that comes with 29” wheels. The flip chip linkage does allow for an easy mullet conversion without much sacrifice to the bottom bracket height. I’m thinking that swapping in my rear 27.5” Nobl TR37 with Onyx hub might be a good setup to try out (gawd, I LOVE that hub!). I was just curious as to the opinions of the group on some of the advantages and disadvantages of mullets on trail-oriented riding that they may have experienced. Photo for colour attached.
Cheers!
I have noticed that most advocates of a mullet setup seem to point to advantages for enduro style riding in terms of responsiveness and agility.
It seems to me that many of the perceived advantages might cross over to a more trail oriented style of riding, but I rarely hear it mentioned. The slightly lower wheel weight, lower rotational mass, less “butt buzz” on the steep rock rolls, and lower crank-to-ground effective gearing ratio from the smaller wheel circumference would, at fist thought, seem to be advantageous for aggressive trail riding as well.
I currently ride a dual 27.5” Giant Trance E, 160/140, predominantly all-mountain/trail style on forested single track with regular forays into cross country and chunky alpine routes. Still lots of heavy chunder, steep rutted fall lines, drops and jumps that would probably put me into a light enduro style of riding as well. I may only spend a couple of days per year at lift-assisted bike parks where the Trance seems to perform quite adequately for my current skill level.
I’m looking into adding a trail oriented SL style bike to the fleet, such as a Trek Fuel Ex-e that comes with 29” wheels. The flip chip linkage does allow for an easy mullet conversion without much sacrifice to the bottom bracket height. I’m thinking that swapping in my rear 27.5” Nobl TR37 with Onyx hub might be a good setup to try out (gawd, I LOVE that hub!). I was just curious as to the opinions of the group on some of the advantages and disadvantages of mullets on trail-oriented riding that they may have experienced. Photo for colour attached.