Yeah, I know I'll eventually will have to go bridge the actual wires. However you would be surprised by how much this solution holds up. I've cruised rockgardens and mid sized jumps an not a problem. The tape only holds the jumper in place until the spring terminals of the holder mechanically...
I do remove the battery, but I don't modify any of its internals, neither modify the wiring of the mount. Here's a picture the I hope clarifies:
I will eventually commit to a permanent modification, but for now this works just fine
Yes, or as I sugested, connect their counterpart terminals at the battery, which seemed easier to me as they are flat (the ones on the mount protrude), and because I didn't have to take the battery mount off of the frame, which you already did
Well, the only reason I´d want to connect to GO+ is because of the parameter setting that are absent in the GO app. If the GO app did what all other vendors are offering in their respective apps, I could not care less about GO+. Bafang is so behind the curve on this front... It´s a shame...
I´m by no means expert in wireless communications, but it seems odd to me that bluetooth v5.0 is the reason there´s no connection between DCP245 v2 and the Go+ app. Does BT v5.1 actually possess a set of features required for this, that v5.0 lacks? I´m curious as to the feasibility of enabling...
Perhaps you could bypass the switch by temporary bridging the battery's front terminals. It's a non destructive method. Just cut a piece of wire long enough to make contact with both terminals, an the stick it to the battery with a piece of duct tape, making sure that the wire is touching both...
Thanks Zimmerframe. After asking I realized that´s a vitus firmware version. I guess that´s not publicly available. Are the weak walking assistance and sudden stops present in the Vitus version?
I am moving my question from another thread as I realize that here´s where it belongs. Hopefully I will get a reply this time.
Can someone point out the differences or improvements that the 48v 10.1 firmware brings over the 6.1 that came with my FC2.0?
Although my testing has been limited, so...
Yeah, I forgot to report that. Indeed, the walking assistance does stop without reason in the middle of the push. The whole walking mode needs a complete revision
I do understand where it comes from. It´s just that IMO, the risk of rolling downhill with a 24 kg bike far outweighs the risk of having an inconvenience in case you accidentally turn on an "always on" walk assistance.
Can someone point out the differences or improvements that the 48v 10.1 firmware brings over the 6.1 that came with my FC2.0?
Although my testing has been limited, so far the things I don't like about 6.1 are basically:
sometimes the controller has restarted on me several times, although...
I do have it, I ordered it together with brake sensors and the frame+motor+battery. I will try it later, as atm I sincerely just want to ride the damn thingy. I am familiar with how easy it is to install, although I realize it needs an CAN to CAN extension cable to reach the motor, which I don´t...
I managed to put it all together and make it work. Indeed, connectors are color coded and only fit where they belong.
As a piece of advice for newbies like me reading this thread, make sure that connectors are fully inserted, as the connection is made only when they are bottomed out in their...