Review A-XOC CE2 Replacement back protector

Zimmerframe

MUPPET
Subscriber
Jun 12, 2019
14,017
20,775
Brittany, France
Product Image:
axoc.png


Product name: A-XOC CE2 Replacement back protector
Price paid: £40
Score (out of 10): 10

Review: The material used in this was originally developed by A-XOC's sister company D-NOV. They specialise in energy and noise absorbance products for the automotive and rail industries.

Initially A-XOC released a selection of 7mm thick CE2 limb armour panels - shoulders, hips, elbows, knees.

Some time later, they released the back protector. Available in two lengths, this is the large at 50cm long. Generally designed to be used as a replacement/upgrade for existing body armour.

The A-XOC impresses in two areas. Its effectiveness for it's thickness - 14mm and CE2 rated . Actually 30% more than CE2 at 7nm. For Comparison, the latest D30 BP4 back protector is 16mm thick and only CE1 rated. Secondly, it's breathability. The open tube structure lets huge amounts of air though to the back and around the tubes against the back.

The standard A-XOC is pictured at the top. The version I have is the "Held" version. Held use this is several of their motorcycle jackets. It differs from the standard A-XOC one in that it has an additional 2mm foam panel on the outside. I'm not sure if this is to give the protector more rigidity (they're quite floppy) or just to give a nicer/softer finish against the outside of their jackets. The foam means that some of the standard open holes are blocked, though I guess if you needed more air you could punch holes through.

The A-XOC retails at €75. If you look around, you can find the Held version for £40.

I mention the foam as possibly more rigidity as I have read several comments from people having to put some thread or zip ties at the top of the armour to stop it sliding down. This probably happens more in a looser fitting moto jacket. In the Racer Motion 2, it stays in place perfectly.

In comparison :

This is the "outside" On the left, the Held A-XOC in Large. On the right a D3O BP4 in Medium.

axoc out.jpg


The insides :

Axoc In.jpg


Yes, all the squidgy (not that squidgy) tubes go against your back so the flatter outside can disperse impacts over a large area.

I was a bit concerned that it might feel like you were being permanently attacked by a giant jellyfish, but you can't actually feel anything.

The open tube structure means it's considerably cooler against the skin than the D3O pad. As much as I like the D3O pad and the Leatt pads for example, they trap a lot of moisture against you and cause you to sweat more than you want to.

If there's an interesting statistic, it's weight. I imagined the A-XOC would be lighter - as it looks like it's mainly an open structure, but it's actually heavier than the more "foamy" D3O pad. 420g against 333g.

Unlike D3O pads, the A-XOC can also be washed at upto 30c.

This being the "Held" version, with the extra 2mm foam pad, means that both armors are 16mm thick. The big difference being that the A-XOC/Held armour breaths better and is CE2 rather than CE1.

Both are very flexible and mould to your back. Both return to their existing shapes if you bend the hell out of them. The A-XOC/Held armour can actually be rolled or squished up quite small, so you could carry your armour in a very small bag if needed.

The A-XOC armour is made from polynorbornene. Unlike most of the other PU based armours, this shouldn't lose it's flexibility and reactivity after a few years.
 

EME

MUPPET
Aug 14, 2020
262
230
Zug
@Zimmerframe I appreciate you are really into this ( I thought I was too!) but I assume I don't buy these things and tape them to my back ? What clothing do you actually require for this stuff ? Without reference Im a little lost as to what to do when and what the review really suggests ?
 

Zimmerframe

MUPPET
Subscriber
Jun 12, 2019
14,017
20,775
Brittany, France
Hi @EME , you're correct, I assumed people would know what it was for rather than actually taking the time to explain. Ooops.

It's basically a replacement back protector which could be used to replace the back protector in someone's existing "body armour top".

There are also just "back protectors". These are often a back protector held in place by some shoulder straps and possibly a kidney belt. The actual armour panel is often removable so it can be removed for washing or replacing if it's damaged.

In this case, they do two different sizes, this one is 29 by 50cm so would be used to replace a similar sized piece.

Why would someone do that ? Their existing armour might be quite old and not very effective by modern standards. It could be an older "reactive armour" which no longer reacts correctly. They might want to upgrade from something rated CE1 , to something rated CE2 - so it ultimately gives more protection. In this case, more protection without any more bulk. Or they might want something which breaths better so it's cooler and more comfortable to wear.

In my case I've used it in a Racer Motion 2 Top. Admittedly most people wouldn't buy a Racer motion 2 Top , which has the latest D3O BP4 back protector in, and replace it straight away with an alternative. But, it fits perfectly so it's ideal for testing, it's also cooler and offers better protection, so is actually a better back protector for hitting the goals aimed for by the Racer Motion 2.
 

carlbiker

🛡️🚵🛡️
Sep 15, 2020
1,047
455
leeds england
Just seen this cheers, great as always ?

1/4 weight penalty for CE2 is fantastic!
How does the ventilation work however, one side looks better than the d30 but the other looks worse weirdly

hmmm close to buying nevertheless
 

wepn

The Barking Owl ?
Jul 18, 2019
1,006
1,145
AU
Seriously high quality content on considerations of primary importance. All really spelt out properly from probably one of the most experienced fall guys in the world :cool:

Thanks Zim.
 

Zimmerframe

MUPPET
Subscriber
Jun 12, 2019
14,017
20,775
Brittany, France
How does the ventilation work however, one side looks better than the d30 but the other looks worse weirdly
The Held version has a lot more blocked holes than the standard version. The D3O looks really well vented from the outside, but the vent holes taper, so it's not as vented as it first appears. The none vented area is also pressed against your back so there's not much circulalatory airflow under the armour. The "tubes" of the A-XOC let air move around all over, so whilst any structure like that will reduce air flow and ultimately act as some form of insulation (like a string vest) - if feels way cooler than the D3O.
 

EMTB Forums

Since 2018

The World's largest electric mountain bike community.

553K
Messages
27,972
Members
Join Our Community

Latest articles


Top