The most reliable motor brand (in Norway)

A poll was posted on a big Norwegian emtb facebook group. There are limitations to facebook surveys, but the guy posting it found a nice solution. People got to vote on the brand they own and if they ever had the motor replaced under warranty. The facebook group and poll are mainly about factory built emtbs, not DIY ebikes. I'll get back to any weaknesses with such a poll at the end of this article. First let's focus on the results.




One in four motors have been replaced!​

Data for 817 motors was collected in this poll. Out of these, 201 motors have been replaced under warranty. That sounds like a lot, but I will offer an explaination later in the article.

Results for market share and motors swapped under warranty.


There is just too little data for the 5 motors with the least votes, so I'm ignoring them. But you might disagree, feel free to interpret the data as you wish. I declare Yamaha and Bafang the winners. Sure, some of the Bafang motors could be used in DIY builds which makes it more difficult getting a new one under warranty. But factory brands such as Forestal and Elife (Norwegian) are represented here. Yamaha and Bafang offer spare parts so their motors can more easily be repaired. This means the error rate could be higher than indicated here. The motors might have been repaired rather than swapped.

The battle of the big three​

Bosch, Shimano and Brose are by far the three biggest motor brands in this poll. Bosch accounts for over 40% of the motors while Shimano accounts for 30%. Bosch has the lowest error rate of 22% while Shimano is closer to 28%. And then there's another bump up to almost 32% for Brose, which mainly consists of Specialized bikes.

The Bosch Performance CX gen4
The Shimano EP801 appeared on bikes for the 2024 season and it very likely isn't dominating the Shimano data.
Regarding Specialized, even though there is little data for the Mahle motor, it's likely much more reliable than the Brose.

One could argue a few percent below or above the average isn't significant. But it's 5% separating Shimano and Bosch, and there are about 600 data points for these two brands. I think that's pretty robust and a good indication that Bosch motors have been more reliable.

But this doesn't mean you'll get a more robust motor if you buy a Bosch-powered bike over one with Shimano in 2025. Both Bosch and Shimano have released new motors lately. My impression is Bosch struggled the most with the CX gen2 while Shimano struggled with the E7000 and the EP800 version of the EP8. These motors are gone now, but they likely make a considerable impact on this poll. Due to limitations in the poll, people weren't asked which specific model they own.

There are probably a few 2016/2017 Yamahas represented in this survey.
The original Shimano EP8 (EP800) is presumably well represented in the survey..

My comments on the data​

The data is very likely dominated by older and discontinued models. Still, I think the data for the top 5 brands is of some interest. The remaining 5 brands have received very few votes, and I can't draw any conclusions based upon that. Also, we get an impression of market share, which is nice.

It's worth considering that ebikes have 5 years of warranty in Norway. That will inflate the error ratio. If the same question had been asked in a country with 2 years of warranty. The ratio of warranty swapped motors would very likely be lower. Sure, a 5-year warranty is a blessing. But it can also be a curse. No one will have a 3rd party servicing their motor as that will void the warranty. And after 5 years have passed, the motor might very well be too worn and damaged to be serviceable.

The Giant motors have been registered as Yamaha.
About author
knut7
Main editor at emtbforums.com and owner of emtb.no.
https://emtb.no/contact/

Comments

What about when you are out of warranty? If nothing else it is incredibly wasteful for emtbs and their parts to be considered essentially a disposable. The industry needs to do better. Would be nice if the EU came through with something to encourage (force rather) manufactures to do better. Looks like Norway has the right idea with 5 year warranties.
I live in Norway and seldom keep products longer than 5 years.
Actually it's not 5 years warranty but 5 years complaint under the Consumer Purchase Act that is not the same as warranty just better 😁
 
From a personal point of view I understand that mechanical/electrical items and devices can fail at any time even when maintained and treated correctly. The disappointing thing which really annoys me with ebikes is the fact that in most cases we can't get spares for or repair the motors.
We can't even buy off the shelf replacements at bike shops. This can't be right. I should be able to buy parts and attempt a home repair or call at my LBS and pick up a new or refurbed motor and have my expensive bike back in action the same day
Agree mostly. You can for somethings, it just cost several hundred percent more then it cost to make said items. Unless you do the Ali route.
 
For me, it corresponds to what our company went through in 2024. . I would only perhaps distinguish the generation and types of engines, I would move Bosch higher (at least "two") and I would divide Brose into ALU and MAG. I must note that we do not repair Bafang. The number of engines (of the order of a hundred) allows for the above summary. For those who want to buy an ebike, I think the survey met its goal and the author should be thanked. I would like to remind owners of Yamaha engines that yes - there is a victory, but do not forget about service (lubricant outside the engine). Happy kilometers to everyone not only in 2025. Ebikemotorstudio.cz

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The problem with durability is that it adds weight and wouldn't be good for a small form factor. A very reliable ebike that you could pressure wash would weigh between 30-40 kg.
 
These statistics does not make any sense. I own a Kenevo SL, I am on my 5th motor in 3 years replaced under waranty. I have two buddies riding the same bike, one is on his 6th motor and the other on his second i approx same time span. The Mahle 1.1 motor is not designed for riding 3000km mtb a year in various temperatures, rain and lots of vibrations IMHO. Specialized are good on the waranty though, I will give them that...
I have a Levo SL with the 1.1 motor in it and apart from replacing the sprag bearing at 8,000km it's still going strong at 13,500km. I have 5 friends that also have older Levo SLs and they also haven't had any issue and they are all around the 3,000 to 5,000km mark. I think in small data groups you can't make an informed decision on the true reliability.
 
From a personal point of view I understand that mechanical/electrical items and devices can fail at any time even when maintained and treated correctly. The disappointing thing which really annoys me with ebikes is the fact that in most cases we can't get spares for or repair the motors.
We can't even buy off the shelf replacements at bike shops. This can't be right. I should be able to buy parts and attempt a home repair or call at my LBS and pick up a new or refurbed motor and have my expensive bike back in action the same day
I agree.
To make these motors more reliable would most likely add weight, add drag and increase the physical size of the motor. It is what it is, but you should be able to rebuild the motors and buy the spare parts to rebuild them yourself (out of warrantee) or buy a whole new motor/control unit/battery/harness. This is the thing that it most disappointing from almost all the motor manufacturers.
If you bought a new motorcycle, you could buy all the parts to service and rebuild, almost any part of that bike for around 10 years. Ebikes should be no different.
 
In the long term, I think this is where the motor gearbox units will come into their own. Once such types have been through a couple of iterations and the form factor and weight is more suited to frame design they will take over. The present situation of unreliable motors, dubious watertightness, the constant attrition of expensive drivetrain and motor parts is scandalous.
I've owned an EMTB for three years (Trek Rail), the motor has generally been reliable, although it is my second bike and as such is not heavily used, but it has chewed through a fair amount of overstressed and prematurely worn out components, making it very costly to maintain in my opinion. This contributes to my limiting the use of the bike in favour of a normal MTB most of the time.
I will not buy another E-Bike with a motor and drivetrain setup as they are currently manufactured. My next upgrade will likely be some form of MGU and belt drive combination, probably in a few years' time when the technology matures .
 
Sealed gearbox/motor combinations always will be heavier than a classic drivetrain. Which parts did fail on your bike?

In my experience its simply the lightweight aluminum cassettes which are not suited for the power of ebike motors but get specced anyway.

I think steel cassettes or especially stuff like linkglide will hold up better.

I avoid riding in wet conditions due to different reasons and my bikes don't see that much mileage/stress because I ride only trails but not slowly. I don't ride blind trough every rock garden though and I can anticipate when a rock formation will cause a pedal strike or destroy my derailleur.

That way I never destroyed one or snapped a hanger. Only bent hangers are annoying. And the only chain I ever snapped was on my acoustic bike.

But changing/fixing hangers once in a while and a rough clean/lube after every ride keeps things running pretty smoothly.
 
Sealed gearbox/motor combinations always will be heavier than a classic drivetrain. Which parts did fail on your bike?

In my experience its simply the lightweight aluminum cassettes which are not suited for the power of ebike motors but get specced anyway.

I think steel cassettes or especially stuff like linkglide will hold up better.

I avoid riding in wet conditions due to different reasons and my bikes don't see that much mileage/stress because I ride only trails but not slowly. I don't ride blind trough every rock garden though and I can anticipate when a rock formation will cause a pedal strike or destroy my derailleur.

That way I never destroyed one or snapped a hanger. Only bent hangers are annoying. And the only chain I ever snapped was on my acoustic bike.

But changing/fixing hangers once in a while and a rough clean/lube after every ride keeps things running pretty smoothly.
I agree with your comments about lightweight components. My bike came with a mechanical Sram XX1 group set fitted. The derailleur was destroyed in accident early on, I pulled a large branch through the rear wheel on a trail. I was riding at full power at the time, resulting in major damage to the bike. During the repairs I changed to GX AXS for something more durable and also to reduce the rats nest of cabling through the frame and above the motor. I subsequently had a lot of issues with the AXS derailleur bending mech hangers (probably a result of shifting under load inadvertently on occasions, although I try not to). The AXS derailleur never stayed properly indexed for more than a few rides at a time. Since fitting I have have replaced three mech hangers, two chains and a cassette; on a bike I ride about twice a month! These components are not designed to handle the motor power and manufacturers should not be fitting them. I changed over to a steel, eleven speed Shimano Linkglide setup over Christmas, hopefully this will be longer lasting. I am back to a cabled derailleur but I pulled out the motor and resolved the mess Trek installed.

I find shifting under load is sometimes unavoidable on rough or unexpected terrain obstacles and the Bosch motor overrun feature does not help in this situation, this is one of the reasons I am interested in a gearbox system. Maybe I need to improve my skills too!
 
Top