The most reliable motor brand (in Norway)

A poll was posted on a big Norwegian emtb facebook group. There are limitations to facebook surveys, but the guy posting it found a nice solution. People got to vote on the brand they own and if they ever had the motor replaced under warranty. The facebook group and poll are mainly about factory built emtbs, not DIY ebikes. I'll get back to any weaknesses with such a poll at the end of this article. First let's focus on the results.




One in four motors have been replaced!​

Data for 817 motors was collected in this poll. Out of these, 201 motors have been replaced under warranty. That sounds like a lot, but I will offer an explaination later in the article.

Results for market share and motors swapped under warranty.


There is just too little data for the 5 motors with the least votes, so I'm ignoring them. But you might disagree, feel free to interpret the data as you wish. I declare Yamaha and Bafang the winners. Sure, some of the Bafang motors could be used in DIY builds which makes it more difficult getting a new one under warranty. But factory brands such as Forestal and Elife (Norwegian) are represented here. Yamaha and Bafang offer spare parts so their motors can more easily be repaired. This means the error rate could be higher than indicated here. The motors might have been repaired rather than swapped.

The battle of the big three​

Bosch, Shimano and Brose are by far the three biggest motor brands in this poll. Bosch accounts for over 40% of the motors while Shimano accounts for 30%. Bosch has the lowest error rate of 22% while Shimano is closer to 28%. And then there's another bump up to almost 32% for Brose, which mainly consists of Specialized bikes.

The Bosch Performance CX gen4
The Shimano EP801 appeared on bikes for the 2024 season and it very likely isn't dominating the Shimano data.
Regarding Specialized, even though there is little data for the Mahle motor, it's likely much more reliable than the Brose.

One could argue a few percent below or above the average isn't significant. But it's 5% separating Shimano and Bosch, and there are about 600 data points for these two brands. I think that's pretty robust and a good indication that Bosch motors have been more reliable.

But this doesn't mean you'll get a more robust motor if you buy a Bosch-powered bike over one with Shimano in 2025. Both Bosch and Shimano have released new motors lately. My impression is Bosch struggled the most with the CX gen2 while Shimano struggled with the E7000 and the EP800 version of the EP8. These motors are gone now, but they likely make a considerable impact on this poll. Due to limitations in the poll, people weren't asked which specific model they own.

There are probably a few 2016/2017 Yamahas represented in this survey.
The original Shimano EP8 (EP800) is presumably well represented in the survey..

My comments on the data​

The data is very likely dominated by older and discontinued models. Still, I think the data for the top 5 brands is of some interest. The remaining 5 brands have received very few votes, and I can't draw any conclusions based upon that. Also, we get an impression of market share, which is nice.

It's worth considering that ebikes have 5 years of warranty in Norway. That will inflate the error ratio. If the same question had been asked in a country with 2 years of warranty. The ratio of warranty swapped motors would very likely be lower. Sure, a 5-year warranty is a blessing. But it can also be a curse. No one will have a 3rd party servicing their motor as that will void the warranty. And after 5 years have passed, the motor might very well be too worn and damaged to be serviceable.

The Giant motors have been registered as Yamaha.
About author
knut7
Main editor at emtbforums.com and owner of emtb.no.
https://emtb.no/contact/

Comments

These statistics does not make any sense. I own a Kenevo SL, I am on my 5th motor in 3 years replaced under waranty. I have two buddies riding the same bike, one is on his 6th motor and the other on his second i approx same time span. The Mahle 1.1 motor is not designed for riding 3000km mtb a year in various temperatures, rain and lots of vibrations IMHO. Specialized are good on the waranty though, I will give them that...
 
"disappointing " maybe the wrong word, "disgusting" would be the word , 24.6% fail rate for something that is basically a 1980s washing machine technology , acceptable level of fails has to be under .01% , if not , get the hell out of the business .
 
These statistics does not make any sense. I own a Kenevo SL, I am on my 5th motor in 3 years replaced under waranty. I have two buddies riding the same bike, one is on his 6th motor and the other on his second i approx same time span. The Mahle 1.1 motor is not designed for riding 3000km mtb a year in various temperatures, rain and lots of vibrations IMHO. Specialized are good on the waranty though, I will give them that...
Maybe all 8 respondents have a 1.2? Or maybe they have just had better luck?
 
5 years warranty...unfair 😀 I have now warranty experience from Shimano also since I got E914 code and got new battery. Took 9 days, not bad. Specialized motor was replaced also in 9 days, not bad. Bosch motor replacement took 5 weeks...and second time after warranty 9 weeks...maybe Bosch is more reliable but their warranty handling time sucks.
 
These statistics does not make any sense. I own a Kenevo SL, I am on my 5th motor in 3 years replaced under waranty. I have two buddies riding the same bike, one is on his 6th motor and the other on his second i approx same time span. The Mahle 1.1 motor is not designed for riding 3000km mtb a year in various temperatures, rain and lots of vibrations IMHO. Specialized are good on the waranty though, I will give them that...
Riding the Levo SL (Mahle 1.1) now in it's 3rd year for around 2.500km per year without any problem. Riding it the whole year here in Germany with lots of rain over the winter and meanwhile hot summers... Battery is also still at 100% (according the app).
 
Brose motor failures on Specialized bikes were a result of Specialized's overly aggressive programming of the motors which overstressed them. Thus, these shouldn't be considered Brose motor failures but rather, implementation failures by Specialized. As the past owner of several bikes with Brose motors and many thousands of miles (Fantic, Bulls, BH), these bikes didn't have motor problems, nor have we heard of many failures on these motors when not on Specialized's bikes.
 
Brose motor failures on Specialized bikes were a result of Specialized's overly aggressive programming of the motors which overstressed them. Thus, these shouldn't be considered Brose motor failures but rather, implementation failures by Specialized. As the past owner of several bikes with Brose motors and many thousands of miles (Fantic, Bulls, BH), these bikes didn't have motor problems, nor have we heard of many failures on these motors when not on Specialized's bikes.
Brose would not have allowed it, had they not been OK with it......
 
Brose motor failures on Specialized bikes were a result of Specialized's overly aggressive programming of the motors which overstressed them. Thus, these shouldn't be considered Brose motor failures but rather, implementation failures by Specialized. As the past owner of several bikes with Brose motors and many thousands of miles (Fantic, Bulls, BH), these bikes didn't have motor problems, nor have we heard of many failures on these motors when not on Specialized's bikes.
Could also be a numbers deal, a lot of specialized bikes out there, not so many frantic, bulls, bh...
 
I know a few lads I occasionally go out with who have had no problems whatsoever. They have a 6 year old bike a 2 years old and a 3 year old and a couple with 4 years old bikes . Bosch and Shimano motors. These lads wouldn't be out three times a week like I am. Possibly once a fortnight. Still thousands of miles trouble free it makes me wonder. Not out in muddy conditions either. Are we expecting too much from these bikes because they cost a fortune.
 
Are we expecting too much from these bikes because they cost a fortune.

Absolutely not. A 20%+ failure rate is and should always be unacceptable. Even more so given the prices of emtbs. Imagine they failure rate carried over to products from other industries?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ari
Absolutely not. A 20%+ failure rate is and should always be unacceptable. Even more so given the prices of emtbs. Imagine they failure rate carried over to products from other industries?
Yep , imagine if the car , plane, boat etc industry had a 24.6% fail rate , they would be behind bars for a long time, maybe some of these ebike motor manufacturers need to be charged with consumer law offenses .
 
High failure rate could be or not because e-bikes are still a new "invention" and under constant development, therefore they are still expensive with a high failure rate like cars, airplanes and everything with a motor when they where launched hundreds of years ago.
Are they better constructed today than 10 years ago?
 
From a personal point of view I understand that mechanical/electrical items and devices can fail at any time even when maintained and treated correctly. The disappointing thing which really annoys me with ebikes is the fact that in most cases we can't get spares for or repair the motors.
We can't even buy off the shelf replacements at bike shops. This can't be right. I should be able to buy parts and attempt a home repair or call at my LBS and pick up a new or refurbed motor and have my expensive bike back in action the same day
 
High failure rate could be or not because e-bikes are still a new "invention" and under constant development, therefore they are still expensive with a high failure rate like cars, airplanes and everything with a motor when they where launched hundreds of years ago.
Are they better constructed today than 10 years ago?
 
Top